Oh, brother. That's a pretty ironic statement coming from someone who consistently seeks to discredit any scientific conclusions over the last 30 years regarding homosexuality unless it's from NARTH.
What’s funny about this statement is you don’t have a clue what “scientific conclusions” you’re talking about. You’re just assuming there are some. Quick, why don’t you Google some up and see if you can defend ONE!
Oh…One more thing, show me ANYWHERE I’ve ever cited NARTH. I’ll save you the trouble, I haven’t. Yet another wrong assumption you take for granted, you are a lemming and shill for things you don’t understand. Grow up and read, there’s more to life than homosexual propaganda.