Is Media Ignoring Boy?s Murder Case Because Suspects Are Gay?

ABC News ^ | 4/13/2003 | ABC News Staff

[JesseHousman]

I'm curious why no one from the ultra-conservative wing here can have a civil discussion...

Now you're saying you didn't say this?

How is the sophomore class this year? Study hard and perhaps you'll complete it.

I don't know where high school students get all the time to sit around most of the day posting nonsense.

[tdadams]

Now you're saying you didn't say this?

No, I did say that and haven't claimed that I didn't. I think you've gotten confused somewhere. Go back and read the threads if you need to catch up.

[TheOtherOne]

Glad you know all about what FR is about in your months here. Maybe some of us conservatives who have been on this site for years have a slighlty different view. There are plenty of homo-phobe sites for you to play on.

These men should be punished as any other criminal. To extrapolte about all gays based on the facts of this case is contrary to logic. Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc.

[John D]

You have never heard of blood transfusions? I know our blood supply is SUPPOSED to be safe, but I am not convinced. What I am convinced of is that homosexuals love to get more AIDS funding and that costs all taxpayers money.
If only homosexuals could get AIDS I, and most others would not worry.

[tdadams]

Yeah, and I've also heard of anecdotes. I may be struck by lightning one day, but I'm not on FR ranting about it.

[John D]

You're not?
From your very first post on this subject you have been ranting about how Freepers are not being fare enough to homosexuals.

[John D]

My fare should have been fair. Sorry

[JesseHousman]

The media, in general, and two posters on this thread, would deny a public accounting of the homosexual life-style.

The anti-intellectualism of media policy is evident by their disdain for the volumes of studies proving that homosexual behavior is a disorder; studies showing that it is not genetically determined, and that it is grotesquely unhealthy. This documentation is readily accessible. But homosexual agenda sycophants know that they cannot refute the science. They cannot refute the medical records. They cannot refute the damage done to so many lives.

If challenged, they refuse the news to you by myriad breast-beating excuses.

Homosexual behavior is protected and promoted daily by the media and those opposing are labeled "homophobic" and "hateful". The media, lead by the likes of the NY Times and eager camp-follower-wannabes pound away at the Christian civilization they so profoundly hate.

While taxpayers have spent hundreds of billions to collect, transport and treat human waste, the media encourages those who swim their demented way upstream to wallow in it at the source. The media creates a dangerous and perverse society, all done in the name of " tolerance".

You who accommodate, and argue pro-homosexual propaganda and attempt to explain this alternate "lifestyle" are as guilty as the media.

[John O]

you never really read what people say do you? A direct attack on me or my prosperity or my posterity for that matter is not socialistic. I bet you believe that we shouldn't have attacked iraq because they were no threat to us either.

[tdadams]

Are you changing the subject deliberately because you've got nothing left to argue or are you just confused?

I said I'm not ranting about being struck by lightning, and I haven't. Seems simple enough to me.

[tdadams]

If a gay person attacks you with a knife, or injects you with AIDS infected blood, or rapes your children, then they have harmed you and will be punished. But barring those unlikely scenarios, your reasoning is socialistic, and should be rejected.

[MEGoody]

"I'd love to hear a non-socialistic explanation of how any gay person has been a detriment to your health or safety."

They were obviously a detriment to Jesse's health and safety.

[MissAmericanPie]

My cop friends say the most savage crimes they have witnessed are gay crimes, and gay on gay crimes.

[tdadams]

All murderers are dangerous, but not all gays are murderers. Try again.

[F16Fighter]

"I am a common sense, pragmatic, classic liberal/libertarian and have never claimed to be anything but."

In other words, it's fine and dandy if the law is subject to mob-rule or the wind-direction, standing up for principle is regarded as foolish, and of course moral relativity is the only position that makes sense.

But at least you're an honest pragmatic, classic liberal/libertarian.

[F16Fighter]

"I'm curious why no one from the ultra-conservative wing here can have a civil discussion on such a heated subject without quickly resorting to juvenile insinuations, mendacious bloviating, and blatant misrepresentation."

Put some ice on it, Nancy. This ain't the DU, is it?

[Clint N. Suhks]

I'm curious why no one from the ultra-conservative wing here can have a civil discussion on such a heated subject without quickly resorting to juvenile insinuations, mendacious bloviating, and blatant misrepresentation.

That’s because you always fire the first shot. You want to start over and have a civil discussion let’s do it, I’ll be the first to apologize if I offend you, just let me know. Your decline will be an impeachment of your statement.

Let’s start with a discussion on how this psychiatric problem began shall we?

[tdadams]

That’s because you always fire the first shot.

I fired the first shot? That's a hoot. You have a long history of barging into a thread and spewing off bellicose dogma. I don't think you have any room to point fingers, let alone make false accusations.

You want to start over and have a civil discussion let’s do it

Sorry, Clint, I'll decline any offers from you. You long ago showed there is no validity to anything you say. Why should I think this offer is any less disingenuous? No, I think I'd just prefer to ignore you, which is what I should have done to begin with.

[JesseHousman]

... most savage crimes they have witnessed are gay crimes, and gay on gay crimes.

And yet, in the face of the mountains of evidence of the evils visited upon society, we have the political left shilling for this repulsive lifestyle that is pervading our culture.

And, we have major corporations and media jumping on the agenda bandwagon putting homosexuals out front and sweating hard to put a happy face on perversion.

[JesseHousman]

...I'd just prefer to ignore you...

What? you still here pecking away? Isn't there a chatroom you can lurk in?