Posted on 08/21/2003 4:47:51 AM PDT by JesseHousman
You don't win because you've nothing to say.
This is about the first thing Adams responded with on this thread:
... gay-bashing...
You're pouting simply because I won't conform, I won't have you dictate to me what I "should" believe. Grow up already. You sound like a playground bully.
You don't win because you've nothing to say.
Is that so? I've said plenty, you simply don't like to have your beliefs challenged, nor to be called to substantiate the things you say. So you're bowing out like a coward. Good riddance.
Another patently false and easily disproven lie. Geesh, I guess you guys have absolutely no regard for the truth when it comes to a subject that raised your invective!
Not including this one, I've made 20 postings on this thread. The first time I used the words "gay bashing" was in my 19th posting, in #100. Hardly the "first thing" I said.
Now, my only question for you is, do you want to admit you're simply being reactionary or go ahead and admit to lying?
The problem with 'homosexual' is that it lends a small amount of credibility to the idea that they were born that way.
I prefer Same-sex Attraction Disorder Sufferer (SADs) as it is more accurate and still describes what their problem is. Or the old fall back, sodomites.
We've minded our own business for far too long. Now we have sodomites attacking our institutions (churches, boy scouts, schools, etc) and corrupting, recruiting, raping, torturing and murdering our children.
It's time to put and end to this plague once and for all. Ignoring a cancer only lets it progress.
(Now to put that in a libertarian context, Their right to perversion stops where it affects my right to live a healthy, safe life. They've over stepped the bounds repeatedly and blatantly)
That's sounds a bit foreboding. What exactly do you have in mind?
I'd love to hear a non-socialistic explanation of how any gay person has been a detriment to your health or safety.
Yes, this is the Rind Study.
BWAHAHAHAHAAAA…
I’m guessing you don’t have the capacity to tell one way or the other. If I remember correctly, you hang on to one biased study you arbitrarily googled up for debate, as proof homosexuality is not a disorder, against myriads of evidence that proves otherwise. You simply are not competent enough to understand that there is no difference between homosexuality and ANY other sexual disorders, instead you and the APA hang onto the silly political social experiment of Liberaltarianism as proof the non-pathology and its poor substitute for science.
I'd guess homosexuals who are so-called "bisexuals" cause problems. Hmmm?
So, unless you're having sex with bisexual men, you've got nothing to worry about.
I hope your unhealty fixation on homosexuals comes to an end, it is clearly causing you great distress.
Umm…you said “I'd love to hear a non-socialistic explanation”, I gave you one... sorry to make you look so stupid.
td, if you had the capacity to understand the first thing about science I’d take that whine seriously. Homosexuality is a paraphilic disorder, it’s was true in 1973 and it’s true today, just because you can’t challenge that don’t be such a drama queen.
Oh please…don’t be such a hypocrite. Do you call those who speak out against abortion, euthanasia, drug use, incest…as being fixated? NO? Then you’re a hypoactive ain’t cha?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.