[Conservinator]

You must be kidding!! Even Darwin came back later in life and said that people "took the ramblings of a fool and made them into a religion" (paraphrased). He also said that to look at the human eye, with all its intricacies, and not believe that there is a divine architect, is truly absurd. I suppose you believe in the big bang theory too!! If that is the case, then let's blow up a printing company and see if a book is produced in the rubble!! Get a life man . . . but better yet, get a relationship with God through His Son, Jesus Christ, and that truth will set you free!!

[Dimensio]

He also said that to look at the human eye, with all its intricacies, and not believe that there is a divine architect, is truly absurd.

This sounds like you got this information from an out-of-context citation. A citation from Darwin is often used by Creationist information sources to show that even he did not believe that the eye could have evolved. They omit a following paragraph where he addresses the very concerns that he raises, explaining that in fact it is not a problem for evolution.

I suppose you believe in the big bang theory too!! If that is the case, then let's blow up a printing company and see if a book is produced in the rubble!!

This is not remotely analogous to evolution.

[PatrickHenry]

You must be kidding!!

No. Check out some of these items: The General Anti-Creationism FAQ .

[MattAMiller]

Even Darwin came back later in life and said that people "took the ramblings of a fool and made them into a religion" (paraphrased).

That's a myth. Not that it would matter. Science is about ideas, not the people who propose them.

I suppose you believe in the big bang theory too!! If that is the case, then let's blow up a printing company and see if a book is produced in the rubble!!

That's not a particluarly good analogy. But at least you recognise that evolution and the Big Bang are two different things.