Why stretch credility to come up with any number of vacant reasons?
There's nothing out of the ordinary in the mechanics of the shooting. Bullet count, achievability, time, ballistics.
Millions of words have been written, arguing that exact point ever since the report came out. It is illogical to deny the fact that a serious controversy exists. You are being as irrational in that denial as some of the conspiracy nuts are in insisting that only they can see the 'truth'..
We will never know the truth of this issue, because the Warren report is flawed.
The alternate views don't make sense. Why stretch credility to come up with any number of vacant reasons?
Why blindly insist that a government report that some of its own members admitted was biased, is the only true view of the matter?
It strains credulity indeed.