[DittoJed2]

How about having a discussion with someone instead of trying to pummel them?
WOW!!!!!! You all are so bad! It's like the democrats who go out and do something and then accuse the Republicans of being the ones who do it. I've been trying for, what, 2600 posts to have a discussion with you folks and have been called every name in the book. My intellect has been attacked, I've been called a troll, I've been accused of "spamming". Y'all are acting like babies, start throwing food and then cry to mama that I was throwing food at you. For the record:

A history of my posts on this thread.

Originally pinged by f.Christian regarding ideological principles... Post 20

I respond to f.Christian Post 26 by also referring to ideological principles (incidentally defending evolution against the thought that it spawned communism). I go out of my way to contextualize what I am saying.

post 28 engaged by Right Wing Professor

post 30 respond to RWP

post 31-38, a series of exchanges between myself and js1138, initiated by js1138.

39, balrog666 chimes in.

41-43 exchanged between myself and balrog.

balrog tells me to start my own thread in 45.

46-47, I respond.

51, RWP posts to me again.

52, RWP posts a long post about Martin Luther's antisemitism. A post completely irrelevant to my point (which was actually simple).

53-54, I respond.

55 RWP responds

56, I respond to RWP

57, RWP still harpin' on Luther

58 & 59, I respond.

60 jennyp engages me with something from somebody who believes in geocentrism.

61 jennyp further discusses my earlier post about Hitler's use of Darwin.

65 & 67-I respond.

72 jennyp furthers the discussion.

76, I respond with quotes that prove my point.

77 I respond to an earlier post of Juniors regarding the origins of STDs (doesn't have to do with lice, but I didn't bring it up).

78, Aric comes in with insults against me trying to strongarm jennyp into not posting to me.

79- I respond to Aric.

80 Aric continues his hysterics by peppering me with self-contradictory unsubstantiated assertions and name calling.

83 RWP jumps in and calls me a troll.

85 Junior responds to my post to Aric and attacks biblical literalists while still claiming to believe the Bible.

87 I respond to Aric.

88 I respond to RWP's name calling.

89 Aric promises to put me on IGNORE while hurling more insults.

91 Aric shoots his mouth off again, badmouthing me to RWP.

92, I engage Alamo Girl regarding some behavior I find odd, and regarding an earlier post she made regarding my original posting.

93 I respond to Aric

94 I respond to Junior.

96 & 97 more dialogue between Junior and myself.

98 Aric promises that this is his last post to me.

99 Aric badmouths me to Junior.

100 balrog666 joins in the fray and accuses me of wanting to spit in the face of God. (I at this point lose my breakfast).

102 Aric makes one of the few legitimate insults on the thread. :o)

105 Lurking Libertarian brings up why Christians celebrate the Sabbath.

106 Aric again, need I say more?

107 Junior starts talking about marrying a 7th day adventist (unless she was also a lice, it wasn't exactly relevant to the topic).

108 Aric wonders about why Jewish people don't accept Jesus as Messiah.

110 Alamo Girl answers me.

112 I answer Aric's assertions with evolutionist quotes.

113 answer Lurking Libertarian's Sabbath questions.

114 answer Aric.

115 and called willfully ignorant by Aric

116 I tell him he doesn't want to go there.

117 Post articles by world renouned specialist William Lane Craig on the historicity of the Bible (as well as other pertinent items to Aric's post).

118 Aric responds to my quotes post.

119 Aric throws up his months in Turkey and uses them to support his expertise on the origins of world religions.

120 Aric jumps with glee at the thought of trying to pick apart William Lane Craig's articles.

121 I compare my credentials to his and question his study in Turkey as being a good indicator of making him expert on anything.

122 Think Please asks me where I got the quotes from.

123 I laugh at Aric.

I tell Think Please to check the net (got them from several places).

125 RWP is still talking about non-lice related material.

127 I'm accused of making a whacky claim regarding a S.J. Gould quote and it is inferred that my posts should follow the same standards as a Masters Thesis- sheesh!

128 What A Joke accuses me of posting out of context quotes, but provides not proof they are out of context.

130, RWP calls me a Troll again and uses his professorship as something that supposedly trumps my credentials in my answer to Aric's credentials. Trys to get me to go to a separate thread to discuss a point I wasn't even making.

131 Dimensio engages me regarding how the theory of gravity doesn't make moral claims.

132 I answer RWP by wondering what his point was since I never said that evolution was the sole influence on Nazism.

133 I answer Dimensio by showing where I believe gravitation is different than evolution.

134 -135 I answer Think Please and Whatajoke.

136 BMCDA gives a page with evolutionist quotes.

137 RWP makes a poor attempt at a power play.

138, I respond accordingly.

139 Dimension asks me to show how evolution gets rid of the moral law giver.

141 What a joke responds to me.

The rest you can read for yourself as it is fairly recent to this post.

[js1138]

Long post, completely unresponsive. Your list of credentials were on display long before this thread. I merely suggest you should consider how others see you.

No one requires formal, academic style references. A link to the source would be sufficient. That's what the internet is great at. Again, the reason you are abused over out of context quotes is that use of quotes to twist another person's words to mean something the person did not intend is a fraud, a lie, and for you in particular, a sin.