Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
Regardless, the First Amendment already has, so arguing that it shouldn't have is like me arguing that that the Packers shouldn't have defeated my Cowboys in the Ice Bowl. It's kind of a done deal.

Cripes, what an attitude. The entire argument is about federal courts making law out of whole cloth and you just bowe your head and mumble "It's kind of a done deal".

For what is worth, that is the statement that I thought you took out of context. Looking back at your post and mine, you didn't. So my accusation is wrong. I apologize.

My mistake was in trying to smooth things over. I should have been quite firm in pointing out that the First Amendment does apply to the states, and that's firmly established constitutional law.

It's pretty weird that this is debatable at a conservative forum.

653 posted on 08/20/2003 7:21:55 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone; lugsoul
It's pretty weird that this is debatable at a conservative forum

We are not talking about the First Amendment in it's entirety, I at least, am talking about the "establishemnt and free exercise" clause of the First Amendment.

I think it is eminently debatable but you're one of the good guys and I don't want to make you an enemy.

We'll have to agree to disagree.

With Lugsoul, on the other hand, I have no problem in wrestling in the mud.

Lug, did you read post #582? :-}

656 posted on 08/20/2003 7:27:39 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson