Regardless, the First Amendment already has, so arguing that it shouldn't have is like me arguing that that the Packers shouldn't have defeated my Cowboys in the Ice Bowl. It's kind of a done deal.
You don't have a grasp of inalienable rights and restrictions on the federal government. Self defense, speech, life and liberty are examples of natural rights endowed by the Creator to individuals. Prohibitions on the federal government from establishing a national religion are a restraint on the government, not individuals.
Regardless, the First Amendment already has, so arguing that it shouldn't have is like me arguing that that the Packers shouldn't have defeated my Cowboys in the Ice Bowl. It's kind of a done deal.
Cripes, what an attitude. The entire argument is about federal courts making law out of whole cloth and you just bowe your head and mumble "It's kind of a done deal". No wonder they can do whatever the hell they want.
By the way, should I be "embarassed" for posting the truth about the 14th Amendment and Judicial Activism? Or should you for accepting it with nary a word to be said about it?