Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dale Brown Reconsidering---May Run Against Byron Dorgan (U.S. Senate Seat from North Dakota)
Grand Forks Herald ^ | August 19, 2003 | Associated Press

Posted on 08/20/2003 8:37:55 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: AuH2ORepublican
If they ever called the game as the rules intended it to be played, O'Neal would have been cut after his rookie season.

Perfect center? Please.

21 posted on 08/21/2003 8:46:13 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Coop
"If they ever called the game as the rules intended it to be played, O'Neal would have been cut after his rookie season."


I don't know how the rules "intended" basketball to be played, and believe that the NBA officials are better judges of that than you or I. Have you ever read about how George Mikan played basketball when his Minneapolis Lakers ruled the BAA (and later the NBA)? He would throw elbows until he got into a good low-post position and then would shoot a hook shot or bank shot. That's how the game was called back in the late 1940s and early 1950s, and Mikan took advantage to the best of his abilities.

Since the mid-1990s, the NBA has allowed a lot more physical play to take place, which for the most part has resulted in lower FG percentages and less scoring (check out the stats from the 1980s and see for yourself how much shooting and scoring has decreased). Shaq has been able to take advantage of his unique physical skills (in the history of basketball, the only other player who has had as much agility, footwork and hand-eye coordination while being over 7 feet tall and over 300 pounds was Wilt Chamberlain) to be in the top 3 or 5 in scoring, rebounding and field goal percentage year in and year out for over a decade. As Dean Smith famously said, "tell me what the rules are and I'll play by them"; Shaq has taken what they have given him and put up Ws for his team. You can't ask for more from a player.
22 posted on 08/21/2003 8:57:17 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
Sadly I think Shaq's days in the NBA are numbered. He has taken so much punishment that the injuries are really beginning to take their toll. I give him maybe 2 or 3 more years at the most before he is forced to retire.
23 posted on 08/21/2003 9:01:10 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
You can't ask for more from a player.

Sure I can. But since this is a ND political thread, let's just agree to disagree, okay? :-)

24 posted on 08/21/2003 9:12:16 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I give him maybe 2 or 3 more years at the most before he is forced to retire.

Now stop teasing right now!

25 posted on 08/21/2003 9:12:41 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
I don't know what you are talking about.
?
26 posted on 08/21/2003 10:22:54 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; Badray; BlackElk; Bonaparte; Canticle_of_Deborah; EternalVigilance; ...
ND Senate race *ping*

My concern in this race all along is Coach Brown's age and health. I feel somewhat hypocritical railing against Arloon Specter on those grounds while touting Coach Brown. This really ought to be Ed Schafer's race, and shame on him for not rising to answer his party's call and run. We haven't won a federal office in ND since 1980, and that is a disgrace.
27 posted on 08/22/2003 12:31:25 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
I think Tom Osborne could have beat Ben Nelson in 2000 if he had run for the Senate and not the House.
28 posted on 08/22/2003 1:38:30 AM PDT by Impy (Don't you fall into the trap, democrats are full of crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Impy
"I think Tom Osborne could have beat Ben Nelson in 2000 if he had run for the Senate and not the House."

Absolutely. This was one of the dumber moves, as we could've easily held that House seat with another candidate. Though Nelson is one of the better 'Rats, a Senator Osborne would've kept the GOP in control of the Senate.

29 posted on 08/22/2003 6:15:35 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Impy
I think Osborne can STILL beat Nelson in 2006!
30 posted on 08/23/2003 9:29:31 AM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson