Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prodigal Son
Ann Coulter's arguments (sometimes presented as firebombs) are rooted in constitutional law, historical fact, and reason.

Garafalo's rants are rooted in a fanatical hatred and nothing more.

There is no basis for comparing the two.
24 posted on 08/20/2003 8:51:32 AM PDT by SolutionsOnly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: SolutionsOnly
Garafalo's rants are rooted in a fanatical hatred and nothing more.

Therefore she is the perfect spokeswoman for the left.

32 posted on 08/20/2003 9:16:12 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: SolutionsOnly
Its the IQ difference. Garafalo's is on the wrong end of the bell curve.
33 posted on 08/20/2003 9:21:07 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: SolutionsOnly
Except for this comparison:

Coulter's rational arguments represent the thinking of the Right.

Garafalo's irrational arguments represent the thinking of the Left.

Both are appropriate spokepersons.
43 posted on 08/20/2003 12:09:54 PM PDT by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson