Replies

The word "yes" coming out of Scott's mouth is new news to me--and to lots of others, too, I think.

If you're a principal, people are just as likely to give you the chair, if they think the whole thing warrants it. A principal is "one of the ones who did it."

As for an accomplice, I don't believe Scott was an accomplice. Either he did this, as one of the actual murderers (which includes--if he hired someone to do it), or he's uninvolved. JMO.

And this is big news. If this story is accurate, and if it is admitted, I think the incident it describes will go a long way towards convicting him.

The words "yes, but" are new, and it changes the original reporting significantly. I'm still wondering where that leak came from. While Fox is generally pretty accurate with their reporting, they do sometimes make errors. I won't speculate about those mistakes, but I have a hunch they'll back away from the direct quote.

As for Vel's speculation about the "cult", there is another remote possibility here. WHAT IF Scott was involved in some kind of drug ring operation; that he was indebted heavily to his "bosses", and they wanted their share, or something along those lines. If there really was some other explanation along those lines, prosecution nor defense will never go there. JMO