I don't know his domestic policy experience but he has quite a bit of foreign policy experience. He was NATO commander for almost three years and has quite a bit of experience dealing with foreign political leaders.
Does any of this mean he'd make a good VP, or even President? Not really, but I have to give him credit where it is due. He DOES have substantial FOREIGN policy experience.
You may be right, but I prefer someone with successful, rather than substantial, experience.
I admit my attitude towards him is tarnished due to the Clinton connection, but he has not impressed me the few times I've seen him on TV. He has a distinct aversion to direct answers.