[elfman2]

" Your quaint explanation was the rhetoric for selling supply-side politics to conservatives and Republicans, but it appears you don't know much about the history of Supply-Side Economics and the Republican Party so why bother? "

If you knew half as much as you claim that I don't, you'd be able to contradict/disprove something, anything, that I said. Since you apparently can't, I suggest you loose the attitude and start thinking independently. You're misguided at best.

[elfman2]

"loose" lose

[JohnGalt]

"I think more spending does equal "good for the economy""


That's the part I can't figure out; you seem to realize on one hand that this line is not from the Supply-Side Playbook and yet you still wrote it but want me to pick a point to debate. I would not know where to start.