[rwfromkansas]

Well, the courts say the 14th Amendment applies the BOR to the states (they are wrong).

But, even if it did, posting the Ten Commandments would not meet the test for what an "establishment of religion" is. That was a very narrow restriction.

[azhenfud]

"But, even if it did, posting the Ten Commandments would not meet the test for what an 'establishment of religion' is. That was a very narrow restriction."

IMO, we need a firm adherance to the latter part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." and then returning to the founding fathers' original intent by reading an "establishment of religion" as being a NOUN instead of accepting it as an action verb.

[lentulusgracchus]

Well, the courts say the 14th Amendment applies the BOR to the states (they are wrong). But, even if it did, posting the Ten Commandments would not meet the test for what an "establishment of religion" is. That was a very narrow restriction.

Disagree with your first statement halfway, agree with the second.

The 14th incorporates itself to the States by its own terms, not by court decisions, and also all the articles of the Bill of Rights via the "Rights and Immunities" clause.

And I agree with you that posting the Mosaic law on a courthouse lawn as a memorial doesn't rise to "establishment" in the sense the Framers meant it.

If the Judge planned to post the Commandments, and then refer to them when ruling on motions or handing down sentences, then that would be "establishment", in the same sense that Islamic republics establish Sharia.