Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Golden Eagle
And what's your source to this, and who made that contribution to public domain? Wasn't IBM was it? Another Unix licensee?

See the earlier post in this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/966726/posts?page=21#21

Or, you can check out my posts to this thread, which I know you have already read and are just pretending ignorance.

Seems that might be something SCO was willing to show in public. No way of knowing, and where are the rest of the pictures and what they show?

SCO has been caught making a monumental error. Can't you come up with better FUD than "what about the rest"? There is no reason to believe that "the rest" is any better than what we have already seen.

I make the same challenge back to you: In the one publicly available example, SCO's claim has been proved wrong. If you believe otherwise, show me the proof. Otherwise, you are just shilling for someone that is only a few steps away from jail for stock fraud.

39 posted on 08/19/2003 1:00:08 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking
Otherwise, you are just shilling for someone that is only a few steps away from jail for stock fraud...

I sincerely hope that is not the situation, but as you probably know my convictions on this issue go beyond this particular case. I'm not convinced yet of the proof you've shown that whoever first supposedly made this publically available had to the right to do so.

Who are you saying it was? BSD? So that makes it guaranteed not SCO? Careful here.

42 posted on 08/19/2003 1:06:23 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson