Replies

Also, he doesn't have a chance in Hell of becoming Veep. The Democrat candidate that picks that horrible SOB for Veep is crazyl. We all must remember that Senator Graham at the time of the vote to authorize War in Iraq said that he didn't vote for it, not because he was antiwar,but because it wasn't strong enough. He felt we should have bypassed Iraq and went to Syria and Lebanon instead. I can assure you had we done that Saddam would still be in power and we would be attacking the tail. So Graham is radioactive.

Nowadays he doesn't remind anybody that he wanted something "stronger," he just says the vague, "I thought we should have kept going after Al Qaeda." He doesn't mention Syria or Lebanon-- which basically give harbor to anti-Israel terror groups. By the way, I am all for getting rid of Assad in Syria, but to do that without getting rid of Saddam is insane.

By the way, I am all for getting rid of Assad in Syria, but to do that without getting rid of Saddam is insane.

I have to wonder if today's events haven't moved Mr. Assad's name up a few spots on George Bush's "To Do" list. I also wouldn't mind that one little bit -Syria's a festering sore that's been begging for a lancing for a long time.