That we have to have a detailed scientific study in order to refute astrology in the 21st century is one of the most disturbing things I have ever seen.
That there are still people who will ignore this powerful refutation leaves me speechless.
"That there are still people who will ignore this powerful refutation leaves me speechless."
Depends on what 'shelf' you find your information, perhaps.
The not-so, "Amazing Randi" has written volumes 'proving' that psychic talents do not exist - you might read it; and believe it. . .
Does not make him right, however. . .
That we have to have a detailed scientific study in order to refute astrology in the 21st century is one of the most disturbing things I have ever seen. That there are still people who will ignore this powerful refutation leaves me speechless.
Funny thing about astrology.
The signs of the Zodiac were set more than 2000 years ago, early in the Age of Pisces. Due to the Precession of the Equinoxes, we are now in the Age of Aquarius. The practical upshot of this is that everyone's astrological sign is really the one after whatever they think it might be. If you think you're a Cancer, you're really a Leo, etc.
Yep. Everyone following their uncannily accurate horoscopes in the daily papers is reading the wrong sign.
