Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq Becomes A Battleground In War On Infidels
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 8-19-2003 | Robin Gedye

Posted on 08/18/2003 5:33:52 PM PDT by blam

Iraq becomes a battleground in war on infidels

By Robin Gedye, Foreign Affairs Writer
(Filed: 19/08/2003)

Muslim fundamentalists from throughout the Middle East are being drawn to Iraq for a protracted guerrilla war, senior military officials said yesterday after a wave of weekend sabotage attacks.

"Far from a new Vietnam, we appear to be heading for a new Afghanistan, Somalia or Chechnya as the next battleground between Islam and the infidels," said one official in Washington.

As he spoke fires still raged on a broken oil pipeline in northern Iraqi and youths bathed in the water gushing from a sabotaged water conduit in Baghdad.

The latest assaults in Iraq, which included a seemingly random mortar attack on a jail in which six Iraqis died and 59 were wounded, seemed designed to cause havoc and sow discontent against coalition forces in Iraq. "By taking on civilian targets as well as military the terrorists are pursuing a two-pronged strategy in demoralising troops while building public discontent," said Jonathan Stevenson, of the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

Contrary to President George W Bush's assertion this month that "Iraq is more secure" than at any time since the war, General John Abizaid, who took over in July from Tommy Franks as the US military commander in Iraq, conceded that resistance had intensified.

"They are better co-ordinated now, less amateurish and their ability to use improvised explosive devices, combined with tactical activity, is more sophisticated," he said.

Resistance fighters speak of operating in cells of five or six members, of being recruited at religious gatherings and of lying low until they receive a call to act. Their aim: to create a new Islamic state, without Saddam Hussein, but equally authoritarian. As targets are broadened, from military to civilian, claims by Washington that the numbers of foreign fighters in the Iraqi resistance are growing have gained credence.

The change in tactics suggests that guerrillas from abroad have grown in influence in recent weeks.

Gen Richard B Myers, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Lt Gen Ricardo Sanchez, the commander of the US ground forces in Iraq, and Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defence secretary, have all suggested that foreign terrorists were an increasing problem for American forces.

Sceptics suggested that this could be an attempt to alienate Iraq's civilian population from the resistance by suggesting that it was being infiltrated by non-Iraqis.

But more than 70 foreign fighters were reported killed last month in a US military assault on a terrorist training camp in the desert west of Baghdad. Local townspeople confirmed that the fighters were from Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Yemen and Afghanistan.

"Iraq is now the central battle in the war on terrorism," Mr Wolfowitz told the Fox television network.

Of particular concern to America is the attraction of Wahhabism, an austere form of Islam prevalent in Saudi Arabia, which is gaining a foothold in Iraq. Wahhabi mosques, funded by Saudi wealth, are becoming centres of opposition to America.

In June, US special forces arrested 15 Saudi Wahhabis and captured a huge supply of weapons and ammunition.

During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s tens of thousands of Muslims volunteered to fight the invader.

Trained in neighbouring Pakistan, they were financed and armed by the CIA. When the Russians withdrew, the so-called "Afghan Arabs" remained to form the basis of what became al-Qa'eda.

Others went on to fight for Islamic causes from Bosnia to Chechnya. Iraq is their new cause celebre.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bait; battleground; bringemon; flypaperstrategy; infidels; iraq; strategery; war

1 posted on 08/18/2003 5:33:53 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
The best way to battle this is with information. By showing the people of Iraq that their OWN people are making there lifes hard - a major portion of the psyops will be won.

But at the macro level - I'd rather have the fighting in Iraq than US soil.
2 posted on 08/18/2003 5:38:01 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
flypaper bttt
3 posted on 08/18/2003 5:38:58 PM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Muslim fundamentalists have no choice. It's either take back Iraq or resign themselves to seeing the rest of the Middle East go the same way.

I just wish both our people and the Iraqis could see clearly that fighting these guys until they give out is the best strategy for everyone for a wide variety of reasons.
4 posted on 08/18/2003 5:42:00 PM PDT by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
Well, you half your wish! Our guys recognize this, and as long as one of the 9 dwarfs, or Hitlery don't become President, we will stay and finish the job.
5 posted on 08/18/2003 5:45:36 PM PDT by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
The latest assaults in Iraq, which included a seemingly random mortar attack on a jail in which six Iraqis died and 59 were wounded,

Now that Hussein's sons are dead, Iraqis in prison are probably talking freely. My guess is that the attack with a mortor (a strictly military weapon that requires training to use) was to silence someone important who was spilling his guts.

6 posted on 08/18/2003 5:56:47 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
"But at the macro level - I'd rather have the fighting in Iraq than US soil."

Yes, I agree. But, I can't figure out why we haven't set-up a TV/radio station as part of the 'hearts and minds' campaign, explain every incident and who are the agressors.

7 posted on 08/18/2003 5:57:47 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
". My guess is that the attack with a mortor (a strictly military weapon that requires training to use) was to silence someone important who was spilling his guts."

Nah, they wanted to kill and disrupt Americans, the prisoners were just collateral.

8 posted on 08/18/2003 6:00:30 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
Let's not forget that the Saudis muslims are setting up their radical "brand of islam" in KOSOVO as well.
9 posted on 08/18/2003 6:01:52 PM PDT by Lion in Winter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
Iraq is now the central battle in the war on terrorism,"

Excellent. Attract all the moths to the flame and then snuff them. the iraqi people will continue to ssuffer, but it will be increasingly clear to them that it is not the US causing the misery, it is fundamentalists. Any intelligence gathered can and will be used to pressure the thugocracies that taint the Middle East. The game is afoot and it looks like good hunting!

Iraq is fundamentally different from Afghanistan in that the support infrastructure for the Jihadists is much less developed. This includes things like technical support, protected training areas and ready access to advanced weapons like Stingers. This is not to say that they can not do these things, but that they don't have nearly the safe haven that was available for the Afghany conflict.

Saudia Arabia is beginning to crack down as the leadership there is starting to recognize the threat to themselves. It is becoming clear to all of the regimes in the region that "if you are not with us, then you are against us".

11 posted on 08/18/2003 6:05:21 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
General John Abizaid.....conceded that resistance had intensified.

"They are better co-ordinated now, less amateurish and their ability to use improvised explosive devices, combined with tactical activity, is more sophisticated," he said.

I don't think he said this, he said the attacks were becoming fewer, but more sophisticated, and they were giving up on attacks on troops and going after "soft targets" such as civilians. This doesn't sound like "intensification" to me, it sounds like desperation.

It wasn't long ago I was hearing of one or two soldiers being killed every two days, not it seems there are two and three day periods when no one is killed at all, and the attacks are mines in the road rather than direct assault.

It seems to me things are getting much better.

12 posted on 08/18/2003 6:56:55 PM PDT by manx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manx
That's what seemed to me to be happening, but I wasn't sure if I was 'seeing what I was seeing.'

Of course the media isn't quite putting together a similar picture of things. What a surprise.
13 posted on 08/18/2003 7:57:57 PM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
As President Bush said, "bring them on." It's a a lot easier to kill them when they concentrate in one place rather than spread out across the world. I don't think they quite understand; we aren't going to fight this war the way we fought Vietnam with one arm tied behind our backs. President Bush never claimed this war against (Islamic) terrorism would be short.
14 posted on 08/18/2003 10:50:44 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson