Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anthrax scare at US State Department after white powder found.
Yahoo News. ^ | Monday August 18, 11:11 PM

Posted on 08/18/2003 10:51:19 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Coop
Seems to me that since Hatfill's name has surfaced, we haven't had any more anthrax attacks

Seems to me that since the 19 rags died crashing airplanes,
they haven't been able to do anymore anthrax attacks.

21 posted on 08/18/2003 11:48:42 AM PDT by ASA Vet ("No Comment.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"she don't lie, she don't lie, she don't lie.... Co-Caine!!"

That does it!!

The wife has theater rehersals tonight.

I'm getting out the scotch and soda, putting on two albums, and setting the sound to "remove ceiling dust" levels.

Life is good!

22 posted on 08/18/2003 11:53:07 AM PDT by G.Mason (Lessons of life need not be fatal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Seems to me that since Hatfill's name has surfaced, we haven't had any more anthrax attacks.

And what about the period between Oct 2001 and June 2002 when the name "surfaced?" No attacks then.

23 posted on 08/18/2003 12:04:34 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Hmmm. Tin-foil hat... on. Ok.

Anthrax attack right after 9/11/01.

Possible antrax attack after blackout (according to Foxnews channel, Al Qaeda is claiming responsibility for blackout, take with grain of salt).

Alright, done.


24 posted on 08/18/2003 12:16:17 PM PDT by Nexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pokerbuddy0; Shermy; Badabing Badaboom; Princeton; The Great Satan
Pinging a few of the usual suspects.


25 posted on 08/18/2003 12:17:39 PM PDT by Sabertooth (Viva la 187!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; ASA Vet; G.Mason
And what about the period between Oct 2001 and June 2002 when the name "surfaced?" No attacks then.

Yep. And this proves Hatfill's innocence? No, it does not. You folks don't know any more than I do if Hatfill's guilty or innocent, but he's in no way earned the title of "scapegoat." There's plenty of reason to suspect him. That's why he's a suspect. Neat how that works, huh?

26 posted on 08/18/2003 12:32:52 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I have an air tight alibi. My dentist will vouch for me:)
27 posted on 08/18/2003 12:50:40 PM PDT by Princeton (the knots of folly grow tighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Don't need no stinkin' trial. Who's got some rope?
28 posted on 08/18/2003 12:53:09 PM PDT by Princeton (the knots of folly grow tighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Coop
And this proves Hatfill's innocence?

We have this quaint legal system in this country whereby the
accused is in fact innocent, until proven guilty.

Neat how that works, huh?

29 posted on 08/18/2003 12:53:53 PM PDT by ASA Vet ("No Comment.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2
"Nevertheless, I have written many times on FR that I believe those crimes were committed by a native English speaking native born American citizen, orchestrating (poorly) the crime to look as if a non-US citizen had done it."

That's the ticket!
30 posted on 08/18/2003 12:56:31 PM PDT by Princeton (the knots of folly grow tighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Coop
And this proves Hatfill's innocence?

No, it disproves your inferrence that the lack of attacks are connected to the surveillance of Hatfill.

31 posted on 08/18/2003 1:16:17 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
No, it disproves your inferrence that the lack of attacks are connected to the surveillance of Hatfill.

Wrong. It does nothing of the sort. And my "inference" was in direct response to the "scapegoat" comment. The man's a suspect, for good reason.

32 posted on 08/18/2003 1:18:45 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: ConservativeMan55
I don't wish anthrax on anyone, but if this incident closes that place for a month or two, so much the better.
34 posted on 08/18/2003 1:54:41 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

35 posted on 08/18/2003 1:59:06 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
Ping
36 posted on 08/18/2003 2:19:20 PM PDT by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Well now that Saddam is out of power, he can't send Anthrax letters anymore.

BUMP!

37 posted on 08/18/2003 6:33:50 PM PDT by thatdewd (History without truth is just another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Fox News reporting that State Department mail is irradiated before delivery. Quite a number of other agencies and some big corporations are doing the same.

I think they use food irradiation equipment for this.
38 posted on 08/19/2003 3:05:38 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Princeton
"Don't need no stinkin' trial. Who's got some rope?"

Exactly.

These people sit on juries?

39 posted on 08/19/2003 4:24:14 AM PDT by G.Mason (Lessons of life need not be fatal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Fox News reporting that State Department mail is irradiated before delivery. Quite a number of other agencies and some big corporations are doing the same.

Which brings up the questions: does irradiation completely destroy anthrax spores? Can analysis determine if anthrax spores were present before irradiation?

I would hope that actual attacks can be distinguished from hoaxes, even if reality might not fit neatly into current FBI theory.

40 posted on 08/19/2003 6:38:44 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson