Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Only the best for University of Tennessee's Shumaker: His pay package was nation's second-highest
Memphis, TN, Commercial-Appeal ^ | 08-17-03 | Locker, Richard

Posted on 08/17/2003 5:47:41 AM PDT by Theodore R.

Only the best for UT's Shumaker Pay package was nation's second-highest

By Richard Locker locker@gomemphis.com August 17, 2003

NASHVILLE - After his selection as UT president last year, Dr. John W. Shumaker said his goal was "to give the people of Tennessee the very best university they can afford while urging them constantly to afford the very best."

It appears that Shumaker convinced state officials to afford the very best when it came to his own pay: His compensation package was worth $733,000 to $800,000 a year in direct and deferred salary and bonuses, plus posh housing, an automobile and several other perks.

Among the questions that have come up following Shumaker's resignation is whether UT really needs to spend that much for its leader.

The money parts of his package alone were enough to rank him second in the nation among public university presidents in the annual survey by The Chronicle of Higher Education.

The Chronicle listed the pay of the University of Texas system's Mark Yudof at $787,319 during the last school year, highest of 131 public universities it surveyed. Shumaker's second-place ranking was based on UT's estimate of his package at $733,550, but a review of his two employment contracts indicates it could have been worth nearly $800,000 this year, if he had remained for the contracts' full six-year term.

The size of Shumaker's package, in a state long mired among the bottom five in most measures of education spending and outcomes, surprised many people.

And last week's UT audit revelations of his lavish spending on the university's tab, which led to his abrupt resignation Aug. 8, have opened a new discussion about what his successor will be paid. Virtually no official contacted believes the next president will be paid that well.

"I think it would be premature to say what we will do at this point," said Johnnie Amonette of Memphis, chairman of the UT Board of Trustees executive committee, which meets Monday to discuss an interim president.

"I don't think you necessarily have to pay anywhere near that much to get a good president," said Eli Fly, Shumaker's predecessor and current president of the nonprofit UT Foundation Inc.

Fly, president for one year after a 41-year career at UT, was paid $259,000 a year and, unlike Shumaker, did not live in the stately university-owned president's residence overlooking Fort Loudon Lake in Knoxville.

Shumaker's pay resulted from a determined drive by former governor Don Sundquist and some UT trustees to lure him away from the University of Louisville, where his total pay was about $600,000 a year.

The search that led to Shumaker began in the summer of 2001 after J. Wade Gilley resigned suddenly 22 months into his tenure as UT president. Embarrassed by the Gilley episode, the governor, who is also chairman of the UT Board, assumed personal control of the search for a successor.

Shumaker, then 59, emerged from a confidential application process conducted by Korn/Ferry International, a headhunting firm under a $90,000 UT contract.

Although Shumaker was one of two finalists, along with Dr. Marlene Strathe, then vice president and provost of the University of Northern Colorado, Sundquist and key trustees focused on the Louisville president from the start.

The committee voted unanimously on Feb. 27, 2002, to offer him the job; he accepted two days later and the full board approved the selection March 5, 2002.

Shumaker's UT package was composed of two separate contracts, one with the university funded by state taxpayer and student tuition dollars, and one with the UT Foundation, funded by contributions by alumni and other private donors.

In addition to its cash value, the UT contract included an automobile and rent-free use of the president's residence, with UT paying for all utilities, maintenance, housekeeping and groundskeeping. It also paid for Shumaker's entertainment and travel expenses, moving expenses that totaled $13,829, plus both the standard benefits package for senior UT administrators and supplemental benefits provided by the UT Foundation.

Under the terms of Shumaker's resignation, he will be paid only his base salary of $365,000 for the rest of this year.

At the May 10, 2002, meeting where the package was approved, Amonette told her colleagues that a college president must "not only be an academician and educational leader but also a corporate CEO, a visionary, a fund-raiser, a public relations expert, a politician and a public official."

Amonette said Friday that when the search first focused on Shumaker, trustees were not aware of his full Louisville compensation. "We had agreed that our goal was to get him, but we had not gotten the numbers at that time."

She also said she did not realize that the pay package UT was offering was as high at it was compared to other schools.

"We saw it as an investment. He had doubled the endowment in Louisville and increased their research grants. I think just from a business standpoint, you couldn't expect someone to come from a smaller university to a five-campus system and take less money. It just wouldn't make sense."

Fly, the former UT president, said that "no one knew when that search first started that the salary would be that high. I suspect that we would have had lots more candidates if it had been known."

Fly said the board should set a ceiling at the start of its new search.

Tennessee Higher Education Commission executive director Richard Rhoda said Friday that Shumaker's pay package surprised the state's higher education community."I don't think the UT Board will offer that kind of package next time. I believe it will be more in line with the average," he said.

By comparison, the chancellor of the Tennessee Board of Regents system, Charles Manning, is paid $215,629 this year and is provided a car.

University of Memphis president Shirley Raines is paid $203,428, receives a $3,000 expense allowance, is provided a car, a residence and an additional $3,000 annual allowance for expenses at the residence. The U of M Foundation provides her a $1 million life insurance policy and a supplemental long-term disability insurance policy.

Shumaker's pay package was not the largest on the Knoxville campus. UT football coach Phil Fulmer's total package is worth an estimated $1.65 million a year. Men's basketball coach Buzz Peterson's contract is for $785,000 a year. And Lady Vols basketball coach Pat Summitt is paid $650,000.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Tennessee; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: coaches; compensation; elifly; knoxville; markyudof; shumaker; ut; utenn; utexas
Shumaker's pay package was not the largest on the Knoxville campus. UT football coach Phil Fulmer's total package is worth an estimated $1.65 million a year. Men's basketball coach Buzz Peterson's contract is for $785,000 a year.

It looks like the author saved the punch line for the last paragraph -- with the coaches!

1 posted on 08/17/2003 5:47:42 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
These pay packages are BS when you look at the state of what is coming out of our universities.

Much like the fact Ann Coulter quotes that California government employees, on average, make MORE than the people who pay their salaries. And then you add on the obscene pensions on top.
2 posted on 08/17/2003 5:55:44 AM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Look, here's my offer. I'll serve as pres. for my current salary, $65K a year, plus I get to live in the campus housing for the pres. and my kid attends for free. I reckon that probably makes it about $150K per year in total.

I have no experience in education (throw the bums out!), but I am a professional bookkeeper (very conservative with other people's money), I'm digustingly honest (honest, I am), I'm very concerned about Higher Education (we need smart, well educated people to run the world), and, the coup de gras, I'm no dummy! Plus, under my leadership we'll practice true "affirmative action" and get the best most diverse student body we can, while holding the line on ability and values. That is to say, I'm a compassionate intellectual.

So, UT, try me, I'm available to re-locate immediately.
3 posted on 08/17/2003 6:03:01 AM PDT by jocon307 (Damn I want this job!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
A winning football coach is rarer than a good university president, and earn a lot of money directly for the school And that is not a lie.
4 posted on 08/17/2003 6:19:08 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Theodore R.
Shumaker's pay package....

was just another chapter in the slimey tales of former Govenor Don Taxquist.........

6 posted on 08/17/2003 7:10:43 AM PDT by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
Look, here's my offer. I'll serve as pres. for my current salary, $65K a year, plus I get to live in the campus housing for the pres. and my kid attends for free. I reckon that probably makes it about $150K per year in total. I have no experience in education (throw the bums out!), but I am a professional bookkeeper (very conservative with other people's money), I'm digustingly honest (honest, I am), I'm very concerned about Higher Education (we need smart, well educated people to run the world), and, the coup de gras, I'm no dummy! Plus, under my leadership we'll practice true "affirmative action" and get the best most diverse student body we can, while holding the line on ability and values. That is to say, I'm a compassionate intellectual. So, UT, try me, I'm available to re-locate immediately

Way too much common sense, you have to be able to not walk and chew gum at the same time to have this position. Besides I have a BS degree from a Tenn. University and would probably make them a better offer. But then I can chew gum, walk and think at the same time.

7 posted on 08/17/2003 8:06:19 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
"...you have to be able to not walk and chew gum at the same time to have this position."

Thanks for your positive feed-back, and good luck to you to, in seeking to fill this position, but it sound more like you need to be a thief to gain the spot. I'd take an honest incompetent over the last two, for sure.
8 posted on 08/17/2003 8:36:52 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Bump!
9 posted on 08/17/2003 8:40:18 AM PDT by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zuggerlee
Any money they generate just gets put back into the athletic program.

In general, true. But UT athletics routinely makes donations to various academic programs on campus (e.g. libraries).

Athletics is the great money hole for almost all univesities.

Sure, but the value and profile they bring more than make up for the cost in many situations.

10 posted on 08/17/2003 8:50:22 AM PDT by Tennessean4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: zuggerlee
You're crazy. While football or basketball, let's say, underwrite the rest of the sports program, the alumni excitement that it awakens and promotes probably represents the largest hook for alumni giving and brand marketing.
12 posted on 08/17/2003 10:18:26 PM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush
"After his selection as UT president last year, Dr. John W. Shumaker...

Among the questions that have come up following Shumaker's resignation is..."

The article seems to gloss over one very relevant detail.

After shooting the moon with an $800,000 package, why did Shumaker resign -- apparently after less than twelve months on the job?

Was it a dead girl? Or a live boy?

13 posted on 08/17/2003 10:35:50 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: okie01
Was it a dead girl? Or a live boy?

drinkin' with "Swimmer" Ted & Sleepin' with Bill Clinton???

15 posted on 08/18/2003 5:04:01 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: zuggerlee
Nuts! Big sports is the primary way for schools to generate enthusiasm for the old alma mater (and for those that aren't alumni). It is the 'hook' for the sale of sweatshirts, banners, shot glasses, etc. A good football (or basketball) program makes it easier for the hit the taxpayer is going to take to subsidize the state school.
It certainly isn't general enthusiasm for the philosophy or mechanical engineering departments.
16 posted on 08/18/2003 9:22:10 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: zuggerlee
Every student contributes a coule of hundred dollars a year to the athletic program at every university as part of their student fees. The athletic program returns only a small portion of that. In addition, athletic success encourages donations to the athletic department which at almost all universities is a private, non-profit organization loosely connected to the university.

In addition, the state or university has to foot the bill for the infrastruture (stadium, arena, etc) for which athletic department does not reimburse the university.

In way you want to measure it, the athletic department is a drain on the normal students and at a state university, a drain on the taxpayers.


Actually, you're dead wrong about this at UT. As a UT student, I pay a $3 facilities fee and a $13 programs/facilities fee. These go to academic buildings and things like the health center and libary. Additionally, the athletic department is actually a private, for-profit, seperate entity. They own the UT logos and power T, which generates millions and millions of dollars a year. UT actually has one of the richest athletic departments in the country. Visit www.tennessee.edu for the academics and www.utsports.com for athletics.
18 posted on 08/18/2003 11:00:43 AM PDT by RockyTop4GOP (12 Days 'til Football Time in Tennessee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: zuggerlee
I perused the "study" that the NCAA had done. Frankly I question it in several areas. First you know what they say about statistics. Well, you can get studies to tell any story too. What did the the NCAA want from a study? I won't claim to know, but I will venture to say that they got it. It appears to me that the report talks specifically about the athletics budget and the operations budget of the school. I think important revenue streams aren't covered by those catagories. TV revenues, those $45 sweatshirts, packaging trips to away games, these revenues weren't included (I don't think) in the tallys done by the researchers. I just don't believe this report. It is really counterintuitive; it doesn't compute with what we know.
20 posted on 08/18/2003 11:27:14 PM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson