To: summer
BTW, I am not at all convinced that "Arnold the Terminator" is CA's answer to its problems. If I was voting in CA, I would vote for the other GOP candidate, McClintock or whatevber his name is, because he seems more likely and willing to rein in the state's out of control spending.One hundred percent agreement. I was for Arnold, largely because he had made statements in the past which indicated a distinct right lean fiscally, but when he appointed Buffet, I switched to the McClintock camp. It's a shame the Califorclosures couldn't borrow Jeb for a while.
To: wayoverontheright
I switched to the McClintock camp. It's a shame the Califorclosures couldn't borrow Jeb for a while
LOL...I think Gov Bush works very hard and stays busy enough in FL! :)
But, I predict a shift of more voters to McClintock as time goes on in this race. Voting for the Dem CA Lt Gov is a vote to keep the losers in office, while McClintock actually knows something about CA govt, is willing to cut spending -- and seems to offer the hope of a fresh start for CA. Maybe Simon should team up as the McClintock Lt. Gov and thereby merge those supporters into one larger group.
48 posted on
08/16/2003 1:26:57 PM PDT by
summer
To: wayoverontheright
I don't know, Arnold has added Rob Lowe, doesn't that make up for Buffet????
61 posted on
08/16/2003 3:45:01 PM PDT by
votelife
(Free Bill Pryor)
To: wayoverontheright
Some key points:
1. NO state income tax. Why do you think Rush moved here.
2. A HEAVILY Republican controlled House and Senate.
79 posted on
08/17/2003 1:14:02 PM PDT by
jslade
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson