Skip to comments.
Surprise! There was no war
The Bangor Daily Snooze ^
| 8/15/03
| Melvin Burke
Posted on 08/16/2003 3:56:59 AM PDT by metesky
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
Another scumball dug in at a public university.
From the tone, it seems he wishes we had a tougher fight in Iraq, wanted more of our troops killed and is disappointed it was "too easy".
1
posted on
08/16/2003 3:57:00 AM PDT
by
metesky
To: metesky
All liberals must be rounded up and convinced to die.
2
posted on
08/16/2003 3:59:05 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: metesky
Yeah, I was barely able to finish this article....belch.
3
posted on
08/16/2003 4:00:37 AM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
To: metesky
This cuss is payed with my tax dollars ?!?!
University of Maine . . hmmm
4
posted on
08/16/2003 4:00:42 AM PDT
by
ChadGore
(Kakkate Koi!)
To: Lazamataz
Oh, we don't have to convince them, we just have to...
Never mind, I don't want to step into banning territory.
5
posted on
08/16/2003 4:02:05 AM PDT
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: mystery-ak
You finished it? I read about 2 lines with serious spew content, sized this one up, and came down to the comments.
6
posted on
08/16/2003 4:02:26 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: metesky
No victory in Iraq? Interesting concept.
So, if a foriegn army invaded the U.S., occupied the entire country, hunted down our leaders, arrested whoever they wanted, set up a new government according to their wishes, and stayed as long as they wanted because our own military decided to abandon their units, run home and hide, it wouldn't be a defeat for us? Not even a little?
What a fascinating point of view.
7
posted on
08/16/2003 4:06:04 AM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Death before electability!)
To: Lazamataz
"All liberals must be rounded up and convinced to die." That's not a bad idea. Liberals have all been talked into voting for people who steal their money and restrict their freedoms, just how hard would it be to talk them into jumping off a bridge?
To: metesky
You forgot the "barf" and "tin-foil hat" alerts. 8^)
To: FreedomPoster
I was hoping Melvin would redeem himself by mentioning the battles in Um Qasr, Basrah and Nasiriyah to name just a few....but, I was mistaken....you'd think I'd learn!
10
posted on
08/16/2003 4:08:49 AM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
To: mystery-ak
This "man" strings together all the cliches he can think of, "illegal" immoral", etc.
When asked how long this occupation/colonization of Iraq will last, the administrations answer is We will stay as long as it takes and not a day longer. ... Bring them on.
Plus he has "Dowdized" his screed by linking two seperate quotes as if they were one.
I wonder if this Veteran For Peace ever heard a shot fired in anger?
11
posted on
08/16/2003 4:08:50 AM PDT
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: Lazamataz
In liberal-speak, the writer unwittingly said, "Da$$ Bush did a great job! Two major occupations in suicide-bomber countries, and it seemed so easy! The enemies seemed to just melt away! I hate him! I hate him! I hate him! It was so easy it should be a crime! It's wrong to win so easilly! Immoral! If I believed in sin, it would be sinful! Dam# him! How will we ever win? I know! Hey everybody, pretend this was all just a hoax, ok?"
12
posted on
08/16/2003 4:09:23 AM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Nazi, liberal, what's the difference? Liberals are worse.)
To: metesky
"This "man" strings together all the cliches he can think of, "illegal" immoral", etc."
Moral relativists simply don't understand the meaning of the word, do they?
13
posted on
08/16/2003 4:11:00 AM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Nazi, liberal, what's the difference? Liberals are worse.)
To: metesky
There was no war in IraqSeems as though he took lessons from Baghdad Bob.
14
posted on
08/16/2003 4:11:45 AM PDT
by
Flyer
(Xenalyte and Allegra ping me to the weirdest threads)
To: ChadGore
I am sorry to say that I had to suffer through this guy's lectures in 1967 and 1968 while I was at the University of Maine. He was railing against the Vietnam war then.
I am trying to figure out which war he is a veteran of. He was teaching at Maine during Vietnam and looked too young for WWII.
15
posted on
08/16/2003 4:11:57 AM PDT
by
bogeybob
To: metesky
This clown is a professor. Imagine that. He suffers from reality issues.
16
posted on
08/16/2003 4:13:42 AM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Nazi, liberal, what's the difference? Liberals are worse.)
To: bogeybob; mhking
Maybe he was a veteran of the Great McCarthy War against American Utopia. This guy is such a loon, I bet mhking would love to read this.
17
posted on
08/16/2003 4:16:15 AM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Nazi, liberal, what's the difference? Liberals are worse.)
To: metesky
The U.S., by this act, bought off the Iraqi army, which it did not defeat, and made them our mercenaries. <\i> So this 'liberal' professor's point is that since we didn't slaughter the Iraqi military to the last man, we didn't win? I don't know how much 'military theory' they teach in college, prof, but an opponent whose soldiers all desert rather than fight automatically 'loses'. Same goes for if they join the other team.
18
posted on
08/16/2003 4:16:42 AM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Death before electability!)
To: metesky
A virtual frenzy of authoritarian self proclamation.
I wish I could live in this guy's world, I could be Jesus, James Bond, Bill Gates, Superman, Michael Jordan, and Einstein all at the same time. A virtual legend in my own mind, simply by proclaiming it to be so.
To: metesky
The author seems to think that it is a terrible thing to win a war with out suffering massive casualties. Well as Sun Tsu wrote in "Art of War" in 450 B.C.:
"For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the supreme excellence."
20
posted on
08/16/2003 4:17:40 AM PDT
by
Jeff F
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson