To: The Old Hoosier
"YOU should read the preposterous prop 187 decision, and learn a bit about our immigration laws before you call me ignorant. You are far too emotionally invested in Schwarzenegger."
I've actually read a great deal on Prop 187. I maintained from the start it was unconstitutional, and, as usual, I was shown to be correct. Any discriminiation by a state based on national origin is illegal.
234 posted on
08/16/2003 11:35:50 AM PDT by
Those_Crazy_Liberals
(Ronaldus Magnus he's our man . . . If he can't do it, no one can.)
To: Those_Crazy_Liberals
"I've actually read a great deal on Prop 187. I maintained from the start it was unconstitutional, and, as usual, I was shown to be correct."
No, you've only be shown to be in agreement with Leftist Carter-appointed Judges. To say 187 is unconstitutional is to spit on the 9th and 10th amendments.
" Any discriminiation by a state based on national origin is illegal."
That mis-characterizes 187. It does nothing of the kind. Whoever replaces Davis should institute 187 as it was duly passed and defend it in court.
237 posted on
08/16/2003 1:15:22 PM PDT by
WOSG
(We liberated Iraq. Now Let's Free Cuba, North Korea, Iran, China, Tibet, Syria, ...)
To: Those_Crazy_Liberals
Any discriminiation by a state based on national origin is illegal. Oh really? So why can't a federal jusge make Californians pay for people still in Mexico? After all, they didn't even break our immigration laws.
And why does federal law allow states to enforce immigration laws when they catch illegal aliens?
And why does federal law positively prohibit states from giving illegal aliens in-state tuition? Sounds to me like they're in some cases encouraging and in other cases forcing discrimination based on national origin.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson