Posted on 08/15/2003 7:33:50 AM PDT by jpthomas
NEW ORLEANS A judge declined yesterday to throw out the Marine Corps' case against a conscientious objector from Seattle who claims he is being court-martialed because he publicly criticized the war in Iraq.
Navy Judge John A. Maksym also denied Lance Cpl. Stephen Funk's lawyer access to Marine files on who else may have been absent without leave and how they were punished.
Funk's lawyer, Stephen Collier, had noted at a hearing Monday that a Marine sergeant said the Marines wanted to make an example out of Funk, a Marine reservist, who attended anti-war rallies and criticized certain training methods in the media.
But Maksym said a sergeant who may have made an inappropriate comment would not have the authority to initiate court-martial proceedings.
"There is simply no evidence before the court that anyone with real authority within the Marine Corps or a department of the Navy targeted the accused for prosecution," Maksym said.
The judge has said he would allow Funk to introduce evidence concerning his conscientious-objector beliefs. Marine spokesman Capt. Patrick Kerr said yesterday's ruling "reinforced our belief that Funk is guilty of desertion and that we in no way singled him out."
Funk missed 47 days of training with his San Jose, Calif.-based unit last February as it mobilized for the war in Iraq.
When Funk turned himself in to the Marines, he applied for discharge as a conscientious objector. Funk also made public that he is gay, although he said that was not his reason for wanting to leave the Marines.
Funk then was transferred to New Orleans with other conscientious objectors for processing.
But unlike the others, Funk now faces a court-martial in September on the charge of shirking important duty, a charge that could carry up to a year in military prison if Funk is found guilty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.