Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nonstatist
Besides, geo synch orbit will allow even better pictures to come across (no grav pull distortions), and is a backup in a way to the

Why not use the ion engines for station keeping and re-boosting the current orbit? If you put it in geo synch, you can no longer service it, until such time as we build something that can take the servicemen that high.

21 posted on 08/15/2003 12:29:03 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
I don't know if the ion engines have sufficient specific impulse for station keeping for Hubble.
22 posted on 08/15/2003 12:36:55 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato; RonF
The alternative is to keep it where it is and spend the money to service it

By 2010 the shuttle will have been in service for 20 yrs and it was originally designed for 15. Its doubtful you could even get to 25; what with some of the 70's technology on-board systems and outer shell/ honeycomb panel structure, batteries, etc that cant be swapped out during repair missions, etc. If we let the last couple years be out of the way of Earth's effects; ie not forced to cycle the Earth every 90 minutes with all the resultant thermal jitter,lost science, etc.. the science retrieval would be great! At least that would be the plan.

23 posted on 08/15/2003 3:04:28 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson