What does that have to do with teens in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area? How does a generalized report of "have ever used marijuana" make Walters a liar? Is that stupid outdated report your rebuttal? Lame.
Are we to believe that Walters intended no larger point in citing the Portland numbers?
How does a generalized report of "have ever used marijuana" make Walters a liar?
It calls into question the clearly intended implication of his statement.
Is that stupid outdated report
Outdated? If you have newer info that contradicts it, let's see it. And what makes the Institute of Medicine's report "stupid"---other than that the facts it states are uncongenial to your pro-War On Marijuana position?