Well, if you'd read my posts, you'd see that I disagreed with him on Consitutional grounds before I heard him spout that number. I freely acknowledge that. But the number calls much more into question than his interpretation of the Constitution.
Next time you want to attribute motive to me, just ask.
#10..The only motive I'm attibuting to you is the one you represented on this thread......and also your suggesting the good judge is a 'kook'...
..I see no mention of the Constitution....
...but my opinion stands----I hope he makes it!