Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quidnunc
And I don't believe may people would agree that neocons, given their small numbers, are entitled to appoint themselves as arbiters of what is, and what is not, conservatism.

107 posted on 08/16/2003 12:21:06 PM PDT by mrustow (no tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: mrustow
Mrustow wrote: And I don't believe may people would agree that neocons, given their small numbers, are entitled to appoint themselves as arbiters of what is, and what is not, conservatism.

Neoconservatives — or as they are called these days, mainline conservatives — are too busy running the government to worry about identifying, cataloging and bickering over the different permutations of conservatism.

108 posted on 08/16/2003 12:29:23 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
Look at Dubya's record. Despite their "small numbers" the neo-con paradigm rules both at home and overseas.
121 posted on 08/18/2003 6:48:23 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson