Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dr_who_2
Or I guess they could go back to the version before the break in and add in all the good patches again.

But no one knows if the patches are good, right?

15 posted on 08/14/2003 7:27:58 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const tag& thisTagWontChange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: KayEyeDoubleDee; dr_who_2
Sorry. I see what you mean about re-adding the patches.
16 posted on 08/14/2003 7:29:25 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const tag& thisTagWontChange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Anyone who can read the code can look for suspicious commits. Preferably the people who maintain that program. No one person maintains all the programs, so this isn't as big a task as you think it is. Nothing wrong with taking a break from adding more features for a security audit. Certainly the other sites that have similar versions of the same source code should have identical source code.
19 posted on 08/14/2003 7:43:48 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson