Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Henk
This may have been addressed elsewhere, but I'll post it anyway. There is a big difference between the reactor being down and the facility being down, as in not supplying power to the grid. I'm no expert, but I can't imagine those facilities would be built without a way to dissipate the heat without running the turbines.
25 posted on 08/14/2003 9:48:36 PM PDT by 70times7 (An open mind is a cesspool of thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: 70times7
Re: "I can't imagine those facilities would be built without a way to dissipate the heat without running the turbines." <-- They do!

29 posted on 08/14/2003 10:11:33 PM PDT by TheFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: 70times7
I can't imagine those facilities would be built without a way to dissipate the heat without running the turbines.

They dump the steam (which normally goes to the turbines) to the atmosphere through a number (16?) of very large valves (8" IIRC). The steam blows hundreds of feet into the air, and is very loud.

During the startup of Diablo Canyon out in California, the first time they tested that, the noise blew sheet-metal panels off the side of the turbine building.

32 posted on 08/15/2003 4:15:10 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson