[eno_]

No, it isn't moronic.

Take, for example, the Rampart scandal in L.A. The whole station was corrupt. Not surprising: once it reaches a critical mass, it goes up to close to 100%.

Do you think Rampart was an anomaly?

Or, look at it this way: You can measure the number of drug runners by the numbers convicted, or you can impute the number from the volume of drugs. Similarly, if most precincts operate similarly to corrupt precincts, you can draw what conclusion?

[Graybeard58]

"Similarly, if most precincts operate similarly to corrupt precincts"

Is this supposed to be logical or are you trying to pull one of them thar spoofs on us?

What an idjut!