Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger's liberal views leave GOP flummoxed; pro-choice, pro-gun control and pro-gay rights
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 08-14-03

Posted on 08/14/2003 6:08:32 AM PDT by Brian S

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:43:16 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Washington -- As Arnold Schwarzenegger explodes onto the national political scene as California's great Republican hope, conservatives are increasingly voicing concern over his lack of right-wing credentials.

From talk radio to the pages of conservative journals, Republicans are openly struggling over whether to rally around a man who may break the Democratic lock on state government, or keep their distance from a candidate who appears to be at odds with their core ideology.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: Brian S
This article is from the SFChronicle. It's a divide and conquer piece of reporting making an attempt to make a win by Arnold seem like a blow to Republicans.

The title should read, "Schwarzenegger's liberal views leave Democrats flummoxed" because the Dems know they can't win against him.

21 posted on 08/14/2003 6:44:16 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The Democrats also believe that fairy tale that Dubya is for cutting the welfare state!
22 posted on 08/14/2003 6:44:55 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Exactly. I prefer to advance conservatism with a nice smile and lots of honey to make it easier for the sheeple to back us.

I too, will get a warm fuzzy the day Arnold is inaugurated, but if he allows Buffet to implement what no doubt will be an extreme liberal economic policy, how would the ensuing disaster under the watch of a "Republican" advance the cause of conservatism?

23 posted on 08/14/2003 6:46:07 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
We'll blame it on a RINO. :)
24 posted on 08/14/2003 6:48:17 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Sun Tsu wrote two millenia ago deception is part of the Art Of War.

And Arnold is masquerading as a conservative. What does this tell you?

Embracing this deceiver and giving him the keys to the most powerful and influential office in the most powerful state in the nation will give him freedom and opportunity to work greater destruction on the soul of the Republican Party than any of our clearly marked liberal enemies that we hold at arm's length could ever hope to accomplish.

The destruction is already well underway as evidenced by otherwise clear-thinking FReepers being not merely willing but breathlessly excited to abandon all conservative principles for the sake of short term political expediencey.

25 posted on 08/14/2003 6:53:28 AM PDT by Kevin Curry (Put Justice Janice Rogers Brown on the Supreme Court--NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
. . . the Dems know they can't win against him.

Savvy Dems realize this upcoming recall election is a win-win for them. Even if Arnold wins, their agenda remains secure. And the agenda is far more important than the symbology.

26 posted on 08/14/2003 6:58:44 AM PDT by Kevin Curry (Put Justice Janice Rogers Brown on the Supreme Court--NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Be very careful about reacting to anything in the leftist media.
27 posted on 08/14/2003 7:01:21 AM PDT by OldFriend ((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Exactly. Hillary recently tried to revive the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. Arnold makes her look silly. Suddenly, Hillary seems paranoid. Not to mention, the Clinton's are becoming old news. Arnold is the same age as the Clinton's. Compared to Arnold, Bill & Hill look like stodgy old politicians.
28 posted on 08/14/2003 7:01:30 AM PDT by carmody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Part of me thinks it's foolish even to talk much about it until the campign begins and he starts stating positions and showing how he'll run.

Having said that....

Though brief, this is almost worth its own thread: If Schwarzenegger would appoint a couple of genuine, unimpeachably-credentialed conservatives to prominent positions in his campaign, the GOP split (and the election) would be over.

Alternately, if he could get together and work out something with McClintock, ditto. (I'm assuming Simon, whom I supported, and who NEVER should have been in THIS race, drops out.)

My only "on the other hand" to that is that moves like Buffet are arguably pragmatic, and do some Demo/moderate defusing. But it's the conservatives he needs to rally, IMHO.

Dan

29 posted on 08/14/2003 7:01:39 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
We'll blame it on a RINO. :)

OK, maybe I worry too much about Buffet, but California needs a major overhaul. It needs someone to stand up to the environmentalists, the trial lawyers, and those within govt. who are anti-capitalist. I had hoped that Arnold would be that guy because he grew up in Austria when it had been governed by socialists, and is on record as saying he saw that "govt is not the answer", also his favorite book was Milton Freidman's Free To Choose.

I'll guarantee you it's not Buffet's favorite book.

30 posted on 08/14/2003 7:02:43 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
It could be but I still have the simpler explanation: Arnold agrees with Buffett so he appointed him. With the exception of some Friedmanesque rhetoric and a few good stands (such as his support of Prop 187) Arnold has a very discouraging record. Moreover, he is currently refusing to rule out raising taxes in a a state which is highly overtaxed and where higher taxes are unpopular with the public.

Now....you may be right, but I will stick with the obvious explanation for now. Occam's razor you know.

31 posted on 08/14/2003 7:05:05 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
So much for morals and principles. What exactly is the difference between demorats and republicans? Each party seems willing to throw out all standards to win an election.

So those of us Freepers who have voted on Schwarzennegger vs. McClintock, etc. have no morals. Do you really want to say that about more than half of Freepers? Or are you just going to say that McClintock and Simon Republicans are too "principled" to vote on anything as stupid as an online poll?

32 posted on 08/14/2003 7:06:59 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Hey....I like Arnold too....but facts are pesky things such as Arnold's refusal to rule out higher taxes in a state which is already overtaxed and where higher taxes are unpopular. Heck, even Davis wants to get rid of the car tax.
33 posted on 08/14/2003 7:07:11 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Davis is history...so you are right that, most likely, Arnold will be gov...however, I believe that those who are rejoicing that California may have a governor with (R) after his name are failing to see the down side.

ONLY someone who understands that CUTTING government, CUTTING buisness taxes, ending foolish over-the-edge envoirnmental restraints, and ending tax paid free-everything to illegals, will be able to assure that California does not fall into default. Ann Coutler wrote about this yesterday. If Arnold doesn't have the guts to do what is needed, the state WILL go into default, to the endangerment the nation first, and the GOP in general.
34 posted on 08/14/2003 7:07:40 AM PDT by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
Arnold IS a liberal Republican who has a few conservative positions. Its been obvious from the beginning. We're not stupid and he knows it and we know it.
35 posted on 08/14/2003 7:08:01 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Freeoers know he is a "liberal Republican?" Take a gander at some of the comments here and you will see otherwise.
36 posted on 08/14/2003 7:09:22 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Impeach the Boy
Its like Ann Coulter wrote the other day: Arnold can save California from itself or help push it into the Pacific Ocean. Either way would be good for America. This state is too crazy for the tastes of us folks on FR.
37 posted on 08/14/2003 7:09:56 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
I was totally for Arnold until he hired Warren Buffet yesterday as economic advisor. Buffet is a guilt ridden, tax and spend liberal, for MORE tax rate progressivity, for the death tax.

What do you want to bet he's on staff to find ways to raise the junk bond ratings of California's bonds so that debt financing costs can be reduced. He may also be on staff so Arnold can twist his arm about Workmens Comp to lead him to find that was a bad idea for a time like this when California was deep in debt. Who knows, but its a certaintly you dont KNOW why he choose him or what his advice will be.

38 posted on 08/14/2003 7:10:37 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Austin Willard Wright
If people want to be deluded I can't help them. Even Rush's not against Arnold yet, he's just noting that with liberal Republicans you may not like everything you get. Simple and straightforward.
39 posted on 08/14/2003 7:11:29 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Impeach the Boy
ONLY someone who understands that CUTTING government, CUTTING buisness taxes, ending foolish over-the-edge envoirnmental restraints, and ending tax paid free-everything to illegals, will be able to assure that California does not fall into default. Ann Coutler wrote about this yesterday. If Arnold doesn't have the guts to do what is needed, the state WILL go into default, to the endangerment the nation first, and the GOP in general.

Absolutely. Long term, this would not be good for the advancement of conservatism, we need to have just as much fear of a RINO as we would a democrat.

I was for Arnold until he appointed Buffet, now, until I hear of something that would change my mind, I'm going to root for McClintock.

40 posted on 08/14/2003 7:13:57 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson