If you had any honor you would not have even signed it. But then, if you had any honor you would not be going around posting private correspondence either.Under the agreement, if we the complying posters observe a poster causing a problem on a thread, we are obligated under the agreement to first politely ask that the poster come into compliance using words such as the following:
546 posted on 08/17/2003 4:02 PM EDT by gore3000
"Hey gore3000, that post of yours (546) was a bit provocative. Under our agreement, the actions of provocateurs, trolls, spammers, and disruptors are prohibited, as is the use of obscene or belittling words to describe another poster or his beliefs. I understand that you're momentarily swept up in the debate, but please restrain yourself."So you've had your polite warning, gore3000. Please remember this. And also remember:
If the non-complying poster (whether the poster has signed the agreement or not) continues to provoke, troll, spam or disrupt then warnings will be posted to others on the threads, to avoid posting to non-complying poster (or a specific non-complying poster) since it could lead to flame wars, etc.
If the conduct continues, any of the otherwise complying posters may engage the non-complying posting with harsh language otherwise prohibited by the agreement. However, there is never any obligation on a complying poster at any time to refrain from pressing abuse on a non-complying poster.
gore3000, since you have signed the agreement, I am now notifying you that your post (546) is inflammatory per se, and thus in violation of our agreement under the Language Clause not to use belittling words, and under the Disclosure clause, providing: "We will not bring an accusation against another poster or his beliefs without also bringing, on the same post, the evidence for that accusation."
[95% of this language is from prior posts by Alamo-Girl. I've changed a few words to fit the occasion.]
I withdrew from the agreement because it had been turned into a weapon for insult and incivility. Your hypocrisy and that of your fellow evolutionists is abundantly proven in the links in my post above.
Isn't that what you did prior to your sham agreement? I seem to remember Blue-skipping placemarkers and Slime posts along with other little demeaning tidbits.
If the conduct continues, any of the otherwise complying posters may engage the non-complying posting with harsh language otherwise prohibited by the agreement. However, there is never any obligation on a complying poster at any time to refrain from pressing abuse on a non-complying poster.You then posted 554, which says:
You used the agreement to persecute ALS. Part of which persecution was accomplished by the totally immoral publication of a private e-mail. The dishonorable actions of the evolutionists and their fellow traveller are abundantly proven in the following posts Post 2496, Post# 2541, Post# 2619 , and Post# 2688 of the Phoebe Debates thread which of course the Clintonian hypocrites of evolution ignored.I had nothing to do with ALS's freepmail. Nor have I "persecuted" ALS. You have therefore posted an accusation without providing any evidence to support your accusation. Your links to the Phoebe thread are all to posts by you, which have nothing to do with, and which present no evidence of my alleged persecution of ALS.
554 posted on 08/17/2003 4:24 PM EDT by gore3000
In that same post (554) you used the demeaning expression "the Clintonian hypocrites of evolution." This is yet another violation of the agreement.
Then, in post 557, you again violated the agreement when you said: "Your hypocrisy and that of your fellow evolutionists is abundantly proven in the links in my post above." You have not demonstrated any hypocracy on my part, so this is another unsupported accusation.
You have therefore, by your actions, shown yourself to be a "non-complying poster." The agreement, by which I am bound, provides:
After having made such a good faith attempt to bring the offending poster into compliance, if the problematic poster continues in the offending behavior we may post a warning (such as: "Don't feed the trolls!") to other posters that the problematic party has chosen not to comply. If the problem persists, the offender may thereafter be called a provocateur, troll, spammer, or disruptor, and doing so will not be a violation of this agreement.Therefore I now declare to all: Gore3000 is violating the agreement. Don't feed the troll!
If your conduct persists, please be advised that you "may thereafter be called a provocateur, troll, spammer, or disruptor, and doing so will not be a violation" of the agreement.