Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DittoJed2
Only 55% of Scientists reportedly believe in Darwinian evolution.

Cite, please.

Many many years ago most scientists believed the earth was flat

Which scientists, when?

(incidentally, the Bible has always claimed the earth was round).

Round, as in a flat disk.

These theories range anywhere from the traditional big-bang primordial soup gig to panspermia (which is a position held by DNA co-founder Francis Crick stating that the world shows intelligent design, but OBVIOUSLY we can't admit God could have done all this, so the aliens came here millions and millions of years ago and planted seeds- boy that's science!

Crick wrote one paper discussing the possibility of panspermia. He has not to my knowledge ever stated the world shows intelligent design.

32 posted on 08/14/2003 12:11:06 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Right Wing Professor
I was reading about Fred Hoyle the other day. His objection to abiogenesis was the assumed absense of a reducing atmosphere in the early earth. He also suggested panspermia. It pushes first life back further without adding much explanation.
38 posted on 08/14/2003 12:25:30 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Right Wing Professor
Only 55% of Scientists reportedly believe in Darwinian evolution.

Cite, please.

Gallup Poll. 1997.

Many many years ago most scientists believed the earth was flat

Which scientists, when?

I was going to say Scientists in the middle ages since the majority of folks in the middle ages were reported to have believed that the earth was flat. But, upon further research, it appears that the flat earth theory was something concocted in the 1800s to tag Christians with- something wholly without proof. So I withdraw that statement but keep the point that I was making. Scientists are continually putting forth their views on things only to find out so often that they are totally and completely wrong. Just because a majority of scientists subscribe to something does NOT make it a fact.

(incidentally, the Bible has always claimed the earth was round).
Round, as in a flat disk.


Since there is no proof that Christians believed in a flat earth at any point in time, and since it has become evident that liabelous flat earth tag can't be found towards Christians before 1830, saying that Christians believed the earth was a flat disk is just idiotic and shows extreme prejudice on your part. The Bible says the earth is round. Christians believe the Bible.

These theories range anywhere from the traditional big-bang primordial soup gig to panspermia (which is a position held by DNA co-founder Francis Crick stating that the world shows intelligent design, but OBVIOUSLY we can't admit God could have done all this, so the aliens came here millions and millions of years ago and planted seeds- boy that's science!

Crick wrote one paper discussing the possibility of panspermia. He has not to my knowledge ever stated the world shows intelligent design.

What in the sam-hill do you think panspermia is supposed to be saying? That Crick believes that earth grew out of non-intelligent life forms like ROCKS?????? No, that's just what the big-bang folks believe.
99 posted on 08/14/2003 9:12:44 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson