Replies

Specifically, they did what you are constantly saying creationists do in partially quoting someone from the other side. The full article was there and available through search on AIG, however, they made it sound as if AIG was conceding something. AIG was not.

Also, there are freak happenings all the time even in the human world. People are born with appendages hanging off of them, with overgrown this that and the other, and with extra bones, etc., There is no photograph of a whale with a leg. Only a story from 1919, which is by nature anectdotal, and does not say that the "leg" protruded 4 feet from the whales body. There was a bone within the whale that is alleged to have measured 4 feet but it was covered with fat and blubber. We know that there are bones within a whale that help with reproduction. Why could this bone not be just an overgrowth of that bone? Oh, I know, because some evolutionist museum journal said so.

Also, when once source presents their evidence simply by quoting another source, who has quoted another source, the documentation is highly questionable.

Why no photos today of whales with legs hanging off of them? Surely if this were something different from a freak overgrowth then you would see some actual evidence.