Replies

Did YOU read and understand both articles?

Do you understand why one is science and one is BS?

If not, on what basis do you evaluate them?

Er, if I may interject something.

It seems to me that - sometimes - where scientists have bothered to read both sides of a scientific argument and form an independent view, they have been called "Intelligent Design" theorists - and thus end up being rejected out-of-hand by both sides. LOL!

No. I did not. But I did not make claims about either.

Regarding your little flame war over this discussion you are trying to start, I invite lurkers and everyone to view the comments made. I made no claims for accuracy, just a desire that someone not just dismiss something based on what someone else's paper said at some time past. The Creationists may not have rebutted that paper, or they may have. We haven't read their work. So, to dismiss it outright is the epitomy of bias, exhibits bad faith, and is frankly arrogant. These men are not just Joe Schmoe off the street without any kind of understanding of science at all. They deserve to be heard. If you disagree with them, that's fine -but good grief it is just BS to condemn a paper of BS before you have even seen it.