Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
As you said, whether they are indeed feathers is debatable even in evolutionary circles. And, as I said, feathered dinosaurs don't equal transitional species any more than hairy long tailed dogs equal cats.
1,736 posted on 08/20/2003 6:38:00 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1715 | View Replies ]


To: DittoJed2
As you said, whether they are indeed feathers is debatable even in evolutionary circles.

Not really. I know you find little rays of hope even where there aren't any, but I'd say the door is about slammed shut on any non-feather interpretation.

And, as I said, feathered dinosaurs don't equal transitional species any more than hairy long tailed dogs equal cats.

Think about this. The thing is not a bird and it has some feathers, although no way are they enough to fly.

You're saying Archaeopteryx is a bird, but Archaeopteryx has almost the same underlying skeleton as the thing which may be a young Sinornithosaurus and which may have some feathers but is a dinosaur.

What modern bird has the skeleton of what modern reptile?

Then, there are the claws.

Fig. 1: Archaeopteryx Fig. 2: Deinonychus
Fig. 3: Hoatzin chick Fig. 4: Hoatzin adult

From here.

( What's a Deinonychus?)

Why do birds have foreclaws that look like dinosaur foreclaws, at least before the bones fuse? Why do fossil birds have unfused dinosaurian foreclaws? (Sort of like, why do fossil whales have legs, if you get my drift.)


1,745 posted on 08/20/2003 7:41:28 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1736 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson