To: AndrewC
OK Andrew, now you are getting a bit lawyerly.
Yes, not only was it an implication, it was a direct attack on a poster, if he had meant it as a general statement, then he should have changed the addressee to ALL.
At the same time, it was a trollish statement that added NOTHING to the thread but animosity, and it was bait in the water to start a flamewar.
His history is eminently clear, his continued behavior is beyond defending.
Why you continue to defend such behavior is beyond me.
173 posted on
08/15/2003 9:35:43 AM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
At the same time, it was a trollish statement that added NOTHING to the thread but animosity, and it was bait in the water to start a flamewar. Your words describe PH's and stolarstorm's posts exactly. And they got a response, 34 and 51 come before 56 unless we use either quantum logic or Archaeopteryx logic.
176 posted on
08/15/2003 9:44:10 AM PDT by
AndrewC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson