To: ThinkPlease
I don't agree with you. It's pretty simple, since all astronomical evidence points to an old universe, started with some sort of rapid expansion from a single entity. There is no other widespread evidence to convince us otherwise at this time.
A voice from heaven wouldn't convince you. And am I to assume that you have consumed all astronomical evidence? To the contrary, there is evidence that shows a young earth even in the stars. Of course, this goes against "the theory", so why bother to even study it.
To: DittoJed2
A voice from heaven wouldn't convince you. And am I to assume that you have consumed all astronomical evidence? To the contrary, there is evidence that shows a young earth even in the stars. Of course, this goes against "the theory", so why bother to even study it.Since I spent 8 years of my life getting an advanced degree in the subject, I can say that I've spent quite a bit of time looking at the data in sufficient detail. I've also spent a bit of time looking at alternative theories, and I've found them very lacking. Creationist theories in astronomy are pretty absymal when it comes to explaining physics in the heavens.
1,012 posted on
08/18/2003 3:49:40 PM PDT by
ThinkPlease
(Fortune Favors the Bold!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson