And it's worse than that.
Even if they did save a little money . . . it would have taken us about 4 to 6 months, beginning to end.
It looks like it's going to take them a year and a half or so.
Time-to-market in the software world is critical. If a product or tool takes an additional *year* using them, even if you do save a little money (and I don't think you do), is that really a 'success'?
Only to Microsoft.