[harpseal]

My response was based upon your statements of all or nothing if one just wants a list of problems which also need addressing we could include the ednagered species act and the damily leave act etc. However you were the one who wanted to drop a nuke on the problem who did not wish to chase down individual enemies with an M-16. Please I sometimes have a hard time undertanding where you stand.

In short I am asking questions to determine axactly what you are saying.

[rdb3]

In short I am asking questions to determine axactly what you are saying.

What I'm saying is that I know I won't get everything I need at once. That's simply not going to happen.

Therefore, I'm playing the political game. Load up a bill with tons of things that I want. Let the debate about the bill begin and all that it entails. For instance, the minimum wage law will receive howls and horror if put on the table. Well, to show that I'm not such a "bad guy," I'll remove that provision provided that the others remain.

But let the support come from the people once it is articulated how the removal of most of these things benefits everyone.

My "nuke" description simply means that I would not be one to battle these things one at a time. I think that I could send the Left scrambling by doing an attack on a lot of things at once. One at a time won't work.

I got a lotta livin' to do before I die, and I ain't got time to waste.