[Lazamataz]

Harpseal may have been a little harsh, but his logic is impeccable. May I suggest you guys address that instead?

I've got a little of the same situation: Crazy_Liberal wants to continuously levy ad hominums even though I keep refocusing back to forcing him to defend his fascist comments, that anyone who even 'insults' the president is an enemy of the state. Crazy_Liberal won't even bother with ANY cogent thought any more, but harpseal will. So why don't you take advantage of the fact that at least you guys are blessed with a decent debater? :o)

[B.Bumbleberry]

Appreciate your comments. I agree Harpseal can carry on a cogent debate. It's just annoying to be on the end of incessant personal attacks, which I don't think he even realizes he is doing. My posts about him in this thread are partly aimed at trying to get him to realize that he is out of line. I'm out of patience, though. I think for him denial is a river in Egypt.

[harpseal]

I really do prefer reasonable discussion. I keep waiting for sme Free Trade advocate to come forth with some facts that show harm for a tariff then we can compare regression analysis and see if a locical generalization vcan be found.