Skip to comments.
Gilligan: The big lie
The Sun ^
| Wed, Aug 13, 2003
| SIMON HUGHES and MICHAEL LEA
Posted on 08/13/2003 7:31:19 PM PDT by swilhelm73
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: swilhelm73
His head, and others, could roll at the BBC.
A bit late, that.
2
posted on
08/13/2003 7:37:29 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
(Punish France, Ignore Germany, Forgive Russia. Canada-well they ARE mostly French)
To: swilhelm73
WOW, can't wait this the American media gets ahold of this. [/sarcasm]
3
posted on
08/13/2003 7:37:36 PM PDT
by
Grig
To: swilhelm73
Gilligan's Island is becoming very lonely indeed.
4
posted on
08/13/2003 7:37:50 PM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
("Magna cum laude, summa cum laude, the radio's too laude." - Johnny Dangerously)
To: .cnI redruM
Did the professor use the bamboo lie detector?
5
posted on
08/13/2003 7:38:51 PM PDT
by
TBall
To: swilhelm73
his failure to take a notebook a basic tool of the trade are worrying Well, journalists use notebooks frequently. But fiction writers have less need of the things.
6
posted on
08/13/2003 7:39:12 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(France delenda est)
To: swilhelm73
SKIP-PERRRRR!
To: TBall
I'm afraid he won't be boozing Ginger and Marianne on BBC's expense account anymore.
8
posted on
08/13/2003 7:42:18 PM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
("Magna cum laude, summa cum laude, the radio's too laude." - Johnny Dangerously)
To: Timesink; cyncooper
It is not true, basically, it is fiction. You have misled the whole world. You've got to read this one!
To: sarasmom
Gee, Skipper! I didn't mean to make that dossier fall on my head!
To: swilhelm73
BBC, Enron, Worldcom, Martha Stewart, NPR, CNN, ABCBSNBC. What's the difference?
To: .cnI redruM
Marianne is more my type, but Ginger would be fun if you could afford it.
12
posted on
08/13/2003 7:45:38 PM PDT
by
TBall
To: TBall
If I had been on that island, the first thing I would do would be to set Gilligan adrift on a raft.
BTW I watched that awful show today. Mary Ann is tough as nails.
13
posted on
08/13/2003 7:49:16 PM PDT
by
yarddog
To: redlipstick
It is not true, basically, it is fiction. You have misled the whole world.Indeed, our own media was already pouncing on this "sexed up" dossier story as additional evidence against Bush and Blair along with the Niger/uranium story.
It was all a lie.
And finally, unless I missed it, a story about this without the usual "But Blair still has much to answer for" garbage.
Also in the article:
But if Gilligan is in trouble, Dr David Kellys reputation is also being hurt by the inquiry.
There is no doubt that this distinguished scientist lied to his bosses, lied to the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee and lied to the Intelligence and Security Committee.
What drove him to lie may emerge as the inquiry proceeds. But it is clear he did go beyond his scientific brief.
In one amazing act of indiscretion he discussed with journalist Susan Watts what he had discussed at lunch with Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon.
To: GOPJ; Pharmboy; reformed_democrat; RatherBiased.com; nopardons; Tamsey; Miss Marple; SwatTeam; ...
This is the New York Times BBC Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
This is the nascent Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this will likely become a high-volume list.
Also feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of the ping list. I can't catch them all!
15
posted on
08/13/2003 8:02:13 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: redlipstick
You've got to read this one!Amazing! Pinged! Thank you!
16
posted on
08/13/2003 8:02:55 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: Timesink
This is utterly disgraceful ; not to mention deplorable. The " vaunted " BEEB, is nothing more than a pack of lying scoundrels.
To: Timesink; MJY1288
And so, sadly, we bid farewell to Uraniumgate, as it sails slowly into the August sunset. Left on shore is Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who hopefully will be asked a few tough questions by people in positions of authority.
To: sarasmom
Kelly was a weak sister. Don't waste your concern on him. He had a gov't office and sought to betray it by talking to the press.
I'm just sad for his family.
And Gilligan needs to lose his job now.
19
posted on
08/13/2003 8:22:00 PM PDT
by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: swilhelm73; MadIvan
Boy, would I love to know what MadIvan had to say about this. I really miss him around here.
Becki
20
posted on
08/13/2003 8:35:00 PM PDT
by
Becki
(Pray continually for our leaders and our troops!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson