To: Ragtime Cowgirl
"The Bush case for going into Iraq was based largely on findings of U.N. and International Atomic Energy "Revisionist? The UN did not approve of war.
4 posted on
08/13/2003 2:56:36 PM PDT by
ex-snook
(American jobs need BALANCED Trade. We buy from you. You buy from us.)
To: ex-snook
No, but the more reasonable Bush Admin used UN reports along with "reams and reams and reams" of documented evidence of Saddam's evildoing to remove him from power for once and for all.
6 posted on
08/13/2003 3:03:12 PM PDT by
Ragtime Cowgirl
(149,998 US troops won hearts and kicked butt w/ their 2 lost brothers yesterday: www.centcom.mil)
To: ex-snook
Revisionist? The UN did not approve of war.How on earth did you read the article and come up with this statement? It did not say that the U.N. approved the war. U.N. findings and U.N. approval are two entirely different things.
14 posted on
08/13/2003 3:29:40 PM PDT by
rdb3
(I'm not a complete idiot. Several parts are missing.)
To: ex-snook
He said "findings" -- those of SCUM under both Ritter and Blix, as well as those findings presented in a long succession of UN resolutions. That the UN resisted the obvious conclusions of it's own findings is not surprising.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson