Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DPB101
Exactly. If this doesn't convince FReepers that Ahnold is not the savior of California, I don't know what will. Whatever he may have once been, he has apparently become a big liberal after being in the Kennedy clan for too long.
59 posted on 08/13/2003 12:28:34 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts; LS
If this doesn't convince FReepers that Ahnold is not the savior of California, I don't know what will.

Until this, I was telling conservatives to rally behind him so they would have a place at the table when he wins. Now, well frankly, I don't care what happens in CA.

This move is simply stupid. People can say, "This isn't about abortion" all they want and they are partially correct. For most, it isn't. And, bottom line, Arnold won't be able to do a darn thing one way or the other concerning abortion. But for a sizable part of the GOP coalition, it is important. To ignore that is to kick them in the teeth. For what? Buffet brings nothing to the feast. Both social conservatives and supply siders are not fond of him.

LS: This is most puzzling, as the last word I had was that Friedman and Kudlow WERE going to be the economic advisors.

I read that too. And thought it great. Now this. Go Figure. A dumb move but then what else to expect from California?

I give up. Let the state go to Mexico. Let Boxer, Buffet, Arnold, Feinstein, Davis and the rest go down to whatever legislature they have in Mexico city and run Upper Mexico from there.

Just kept them and their politics out of the U.S. Congress.

169 posted on 08/13/2003 1:31:25 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson