Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Support growing for federal push toward nanotech energy solutions
SmallTimes ^ | Aug. 13, 2003 | Candace Stuart

Posted on 08/13/2003 9:45:20 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

SUPPORT GROWING FOR FEDERAL PUSH TOWARD NANOTECH ENERGY SOLUTIONS
By Candace Stuart
Small Times Features Editor
 

Print Article
E-Mail Article
Order Reprints
 

image  
 
Photo courtesy of Rice University
 
Wade Adams, director of Rice University’s Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology, opens an energy conference on campus aboard his Segway Human Transporter. The conference drew about 450 attendees.
 
   
 
Aug. 13, 2003 - In Washington, they liken it to the Manhattan Project. In Houston, they prefer an Apollo Program metaphor. But the strategists behind two movements to make energy a priority agree on the need for an all-out commitment akin to efforts to build an atomic bomb during World War II and the space race that followed.

Both the research branch of the Department of Energy and a consortium of scientists, industry leaders and policy-makers attending a summit at Rice University identified nanotechnology as a keystone to clean, efficient and affordable energy.

Organizers of the Rice symposium could complete a draft report by the end of this month, said Wade Adams, director of Rice’s Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology (CNST). The DOE’s Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee released its report in late 2002.

The findings could provide the framework for a program to improve or replace today’s energy technologies. The advancements could be as revolutionary as space-based solar power or as mundane as nanocoatings for oil drill bits, according to presenters at the Rice summit titled, “Energy and Nanotechnology: Strategy for the Future.”

Speakers at the May event discussed everything from fission to fuel cells and included Jeremy Rifkin, author of “The Hydrogen Economy,” and Dean Kamen, inventor and chairman of Segway LLC. While they clashed on specifics, several experts agreed the nation and world will face an energy crisis by midcentury if population, usage and supply projections hold.

“Our goal was to stir it up and educate people,” said Adams. CNST and Rice’s public policy, energy and entrepreneurship institutes hosted the event, which drew about 450 people. “The focus was on the technology challenges across the board.”

The summit was a follow-up to a 2002 regional conference of the National Nanotechnology Initiative, where energy was identified as critical to the multistate area. Houston considers itself the energy capital and a contender for that title in nanotechnology. Attendees included a number of energy professionals, investors and people curious about nanotechnology. 

“We wanted to quantitatively explain what the problem is,” said Richard Smalley, a Nobel Prize-winning chemist at Rice and prominent supporter of nanotechnology. He began advocating nanotechnology to meet energy needs more than a year ago. “Even the
people in industry found it a revelation.

“The problem is, how do you solve it,” he said, referring to growing worldwide demand for energy. “You can’t solve it just by being good. You need new technology.”

The Houston group is calling for a commitment of billions of dollars from the federal government to develop nanotechnology for energy applications. They also are pushing for more funds to educate the next generation of scientists because energy “will be their problem that they have to solve,” Adams said.

They expect to circulate their report among government and industry leaders. It is likely to include support for developing smart distributed energy networks, an approach that Smalley began to embrace after reviewing conference video. Power point presentations and a Web cast from the event are available online at http://cohesion.rice.edu/centersandinst/cnst/whatwedo.cfm?doc_id=2937.

“I’ve had a wonderful time going to the conference about four times,” Smalley said. “I’ve learned things every time.”

Their recommendations will dovetail with those of the DOE committee, said Smalley, who was among its committee leaders. The next step has yet to be decided, but he envisioned the DOE spearheading a drive through its five nanoscale research centers.

 

Related News
 
Prof. Smalley's latest big idea:
Nano-energy will save the Earth


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: energy; nanotech; techindex

1 posted on 08/13/2003 9:45:20 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *tech_index; Salo; MizSterious; shadowman99; Sparta; freedom9; martin_fierro; PatriotGames; ...
OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST
2 posted on 08/13/2003 9:46:16 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Resistance is Stupid!

3 posted on 08/13/2003 9:51:10 AM PDT by bedolido (None of us is as dumb as all of us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
I would not resist!
4 posted on 08/13/2003 9:58:21 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
I surrender! Please!
5 posted on 08/13/2003 10:09:53 AM PDT by FreeLibertarian (You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It's wonderful to be at the center of what could be the next big thing in science. I doubt if Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age is where this is headed, but there are still some amazing things going on. Science is cool that way.
6 posted on 08/13/2003 10:26:33 AM PDT by NetOwl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If the Feds are going to spend money on funding this research, all such research should be in the public domain as a condition of receiving the funding.

That being said, I generally oppose spending money on this sort of thing.

Some areas of initial interest could be better PEMs, slicker more temp resistant lubricants, heat reflective coatings to minimize heat transfer, catalysists that reduce the energy costs to make fuel, better photo cells, longer life / deap discharge batteries, paint additives that reduce drag, etc.

Lots of possible areas to explore. But I still think this should be funded by comercial enterprise.
7 posted on 08/13/2003 10:48:24 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Well get back to us when you do figure it out Dr. Smalley. Another example of socio-political agendas trumping real science in the so-called scientific community.
8 posted on 08/13/2003 12:36:48 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson