Skip to comments.
A Gay Man’s Manifesto (Sobran - good read)
Sobran's ^
| 07/29/2003
| Joseph Sobran
Posted on 08/13/2003 8:51:36 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Decivilizational feelgoodism.
2
posted on
08/13/2003 8:54:16 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
I used to enjoy reading Sobran & Charlie Reese. They've morphed into something strange. I think they have both moved to Vancouver, B.C. and live at the new legal drug injection site or they are simultaniously having LSD flashbacks from their younger days.
To: bigfootbob
I hear you. Sobran's morphed into an antiSemitic whackjob, which is sad. The guy was once one of the best. And this amusing column reminds me of those old days.
4
posted on
08/13/2003 9:02:03 AM PDT
by
ArcLight
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
BUMP!
5
posted on
08/13/2003 9:15:18 AM PDT
by
jimkress
(Go away Pat Go away!)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Great!
6
posted on
08/13/2003 9:27:37 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
To: ArcLight
Agreed. This one is a hoot, though.
7
posted on
08/13/2003 9:56:37 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Liberalism corrupts. Absolute Liberalism corrupts absolutely.)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The Episcopalians are such poor chess players because they turn their queens into bishops.
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
This is such a queer article. But, of course, Joe Sobran is queer.
To me, siding against people who have to deal with suicide terrorists
walking among them, queers a person's sense of justice. Of course,
that is what Sobran has come to over the years. He has made a strange
and queer journey from conservative bulwark to man of hatred. How
queer is that?
9
posted on
08/13/2003 10:13:19 AM PDT
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.blogspot.com/)
To: elhombrelibre
And I think he may actually be on to something here. Liberalism often corrupts and coopts the meaning of words to their benefit in public debate (however limited they allow). They relabel something that is naturally offensive with a sweet, desireable word and present it as the defensible norm against which we are now waging a bully war. Wouldn't it be great if we took back this word and frustrated and stiffled them at their own game? We should all declare ourselves from this point forward as gay men in the truest sense of the word.
To: foolish-one
You already call yourself foolish and now you want to be gay. The word 'bigot' needs salvaging too, I think. It merely means someone set in their ways.
"a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices"
How 'bout it?
11
posted on
08/13/2003 10:25:03 AM PDT
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.blogspot.com/)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Normally I don't care for Sobran, but this is a good article.
12
posted on
08/13/2003 10:44:19 AM PDT
by
King Prout
(people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Bob Hope and Bing Crosby were gay?
This guy is a looney tune. But then, he's gay, so of course he's a looney tune.
13
posted on
08/13/2003 10:52:34 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: MEGoody
Jeez, I should have read the whole article before posting.
14
posted on
08/13/2003 10:54:43 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: MEGoody
Try reading the article slowly, pointing your finger at each word.
15
posted on
08/13/2003 10:57:22 AM PDT
by
Interesting Times
(Leftists view the truth as an easily avoidable nuisance)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Q: How many radical feminists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: That's not funny.
16
posted on
08/13/2003 10:58:04 AM PDT
by
Interesting Times
(Leftists view the truth as an easily avoidable nuisance)
To: gcruse
I may be missing your point here. I'm suggesting taking a word back to it's original meaning and you think I'm bigotted? Please explain exactly what prejudice you have detected or intolerance I have betrayed. Of course, you might have to precisely define intolerance, as well. I have a dictionary here, just in case you don't.
To: gcruse
Besides, what's wrong with being gay?
To: foolish-one
I'm suggesting we salvage the word 'bigot.' The definition is not one of raving haters, just people confirmed in their beliefs and unwilling to be persuaded otherwise. Is that not the sine qua non of religious belief?
19
posted on
08/13/2003 11:28:35 AM PDT
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.blogspot.com/)
To: onedoug
Gosh, I'll bet this nazi nancy-boy is his hero.
20
posted on
08/13/2003 11:35:09 AM PDT
by
Alouette
(Every democratic politician should live next door to a pimp, so he can have someone to look up to.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson