Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
Got this off the moderated ACW newsgroup:

"Lincoln gave it up and in February, 1864, ordered a ship to return the surviving colonists [from Ile A' Vache, Haiti] to the United States. Congress gave the coup de grace to colonization in July, 1864, by repealing all provisions of the legislation of 1862 appropriating funds for colonization purposes." [James M. McPherson, "Abolitionist and Negro Opposition to Colonization During the Civil War," _Phylon,_ Vol XXXVI, No. 4, Winter, 1965, p. 398] Lincoln signed this measure.

David H. Donald wrote of Lincoln, "the failure of his colonization schemes had taught him that African-Americans were, and would remain, a permanent part of the American social fabric. He believed that the more intelligent blacks, especially those who served in the army, were entitled to the suffrage. Hence he encouraged the education of the freedmen, and he supported the Freedmen's Bureau to protect them from exploitation by their former masters." [David H. Donald, _Lincoln,_ p. 583]

As Gabor Boritt wrote, "Colonization was dead and Lincoln did not mourn. He did not march backwards." [Gabor Boritt, "Did He Dream of a Lily-White America? The Voyage to Linconia," in Gabor Boritt, ed., _The Lincoln Enigma,_ p. 17]

In 1864, John Hay recorded in his diary that Lincoln had "sloughed off" all these notions of colonization. [John Hay, _The Complete Civil War Diary of John Hay,_ p. 217, quoted in Ibid., p. 8]

Colonization, incidentally, didn't end with Lincoln. "The American Colonization Society continued its work and in the thirty years following the war sent out more than four thousand emigrants." [Brainerd Dyer, "The Persistencer of the Idea of Negro Colonization," _Pacific Historical Review,_ Vol XII, No. 1, March, 1943, p. 61]

Wade Hampton proposed colonization in 1890 in an article titled "The Race Problem" published in _The Arena,_ Vol 2, July, 1890. William Patrick Calhoun, a Greenville, South Carolina writer, wrote a book in 1902 called _The Caucasian and Negro in the United States. They Must be Separate. If Not, Then Extermination. A Proposed Solution: Colonization._

In 1939, Mississippi Senator Theodore G. Bilbo introduced legislation in Congress that called for the federal government to support a large-scale voluntary migration of blacks to Liberia. [Congressional Record, 76th Congress, 1st Session, 4647, 4650-4676]"

Lincoln abandoned colonization schemes after 1862.

Walt

259 posted on 08/16/2003 3:18:33 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
By the standards of the Wlat Brigade, James Mitchell is a "very loyal and capable Union man" and a "true patriot." Follow your leader. March with pride. Let the world see what the Wlat Brigade supports.

FROM THE PRESIDENTIAL PAPERS OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Drafted by James Mitchell

THE LINCOLN COLONIZATION GAMEPLAN DRAFTED BY JAMES MITCHELL [Image file from the Library of Congress]

Transcript of Lincoln Colonization Gameplan drafted by James Mitchell

[Wlat 1785] Now, Mitchell was a very loyal and capable Union man. If President Lincon would go out of his way to help rebels, what would he do for true patriots?
LINK

Lincoln appointee James Mitchell referred to "the license of the races, which is giving to this continent a nation of bastards." That fits into an acceptable standard for Wlat and the Wlat Brigade.

A letter of December 1864 shows Lincoln still fighting to keep this piece of human garbage around.

All of the grotesque comments below are direct quotations of written statements by James Mitchell to Abraham Lincoln. After James Mitchell made these statements, Abraham Lincoln put him on the payroll and all of these statements and more were sent to the Government Printing Office for publication as a pamphlet at taxpayer expense. You can read the whole disgusting pamphlet at the provided link.

THIS IS WHAT WLAT DEFENDS

require a separation of the colored or negro race from us

Yet, terrible as is this civil war between men of kindred race for the dominion of the servant, future history will show that it has been moderate and altogether tolerable when contrasted with a struggle between the black and white race, which, within the next one or two hundred years must sweep over this nation,

the removal of the colored race to a proper locality . . . Surely this exercise of influence is a legitimate prerogative of the Chief Magistrate, the guardian of national peace, who, being convinced of impending danger to the country, has the undoubted right to notify the nation of its approach, and recommend the remedy.

Our danger in the future arises from the fact that we have 4,500,000 persons, who, whilst amongst us, cannot be of us - persons of a different race

The social and civil evils resulting from the presence of the negro race are numerous

the license of the races, which is giving to this continent a nation of bastards.

That political economist must be blind indeed; that statesman must be a shallow thinker, who cannot see a fearful future before this country, if the production of this mixed race is not checked by removal.

possibly the next great civil war will be the conflict of this race for dominion and existence.

this population is in the way of the peace of the country

Thus far we have found that their presence here disturbs our social structure. We come now to examine how far our civil structure is damaged by this population.

But there is one clause of this sacred compact which requires the Federal government to "guarantee to the several States a republican form of government." . . . When rightly construed it must and will require the gradual removal of such anti-republican elements and peoples as cannot be engrafted on the national stock

It is admitted on all hands that our mixed and servile population constitute the root of those issues and quarrels; what shall be done with them is the question of the hour.

this repulsive admixture of blood

the men of the Exeter Hall school, who, far removed from the scene of danger, see not the degradation of this admixture of race.

he does not choose to endanger the blood of his posterity by the proximity of such a population; that here is no command in the Word of God that will oblige him to place this race on the high road to such an amalgamation with his family

they rejected the black because they could not or would not amalgamate on legal or honorable terms.

Nothing but the authority of the Divine law will change his purpose to hedge himself in and erect legal protections against this possible admixture of blood,

Where men are truly moral and religious, the white and black races do not mix, so that the influence of religion will never effect fusion,

hatred of those who would engraft, as they say, negro blood on the population of their country

We must regard the extension of equal social and civil rights to this class of persons as distasteful to the mass of the nations; the majority will never submit to it

we cannot make republican citizens out of our negro population

a possible corruption of blood in future generations

The government of Great Britain is composed of a few thousand titled and privileged persons, located in a small island, who are born to rule and govern. From their isolated position it is not possible for them to come in contact with the numerous, heterogeneous, and inferior tribes and races under their rule. They are thus protected from possible admixture of inferior blood

How can such a people comprehend the necessity or use of removing the man of color?

to protect them against this repulsive admixture of blood

What is to protect us as a people from degenerating as a race, but the resolve to receive no blood from the other races but that which can be honorably and safely engrafted on the stock of the nation.

Let us then, earnestly and respectfully recommend as a remedy for our present troubles and future danger, the perfecting the proposed plans of the administration in regard to those two conflicting races, and the careful and gradual removal of the colored race to some desirable and convenient home.

Some affect to fear that the man of color will not remove to a separate locality. It is not to be expected that a race, which has hardly attained a mental majority, will rise in a day to the stature of the men who found empires, build cities, and lay the ground work of civil institutions like ours; nor should they be expected to do this unaided and alone. They should receive the kind attention, direction, and aid of those who understand such things; nor will the world condemn a gentle pressure in the forward course to overcome the natural inertia of masses long used to the driver's will and rod. Let us do justice in the provision we make for their future comfort, and surety they will do justice to our distracted Republic.

If they should fail to do this, there would then be more propriety in weighing the requirement of some to remove without consultation, but not till then.

We know that there is a growing sentiment in the country which considered the removal of the freed man, without consulting him, "a moral and military necessity" -- as a measure necessary to the purity of public morals and the peace of the country; and this unhappy war of white man with white man, about the condition of the black, will multiply this sentiment.

But we cannot go further now than suggesting, that the mandatory relation held by the rebel master should escheat to the Federal government in a modified sense, so as to enable his proper government and gradual removal to a proper home where he can be independent.

We earnestly pray that a perpetual barrier may be reared between us and that land of the mixed races of this continent - Mexico.

As Abraham and Lot agreed to separate their conflicting retainer and dependents, the one going to the right and the other to the left, so let those two governments agree to divide this continent between the Anglo-American and mixed races

262 posted on 08/16/2003 3:41:22 AM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyPapa
"Lincoln gave it up and in February, 1864, ordered a ship to return the surviving colonists [from Ile A' Vache, Haiti] to the United States.

Incorrect. Lincoln had the Haiti colonists returned after the government cancelled a contract with the man who had set up the colony. The reason for cancellation? The guy turned out to be a scam artist and was stealing the funds, not some "change of heart" by Lincoln.

Congress gave the coup de grace to colonization in July, 1864, by repealing all provisions of the legislation of 1862 appropriating funds for colonization purposes."

And Lincoln contested this. It's one of the reasons he asked his AG for an opinion to keep on Mitchell in November 1864 and continue his colonization.

[James M. McPherson

...No wonder that quote has so many falsehoods in it!

David H. Donald wrote of Lincoln, "the failure of his colonization schemes had taught him that African-Americans were, and would remain, a permanent part of the American social fabric.

Unsubstantiated speculation. Lincoln never said anything about the failure of colonization, never repudiated it, and by all reasonable evidence believed in it till the day he died.

He believed that the more intelligent blacks, especially those who served in the army, were entitled to the suffrage.

...in some cases, yes. But that's not the issue. The issue is colonization, and absolutely ZERO evidence exists to suggest that he ever repudiated his previous belief.

As Gabor Boritt wrote, "Colonization was dead and Lincoln did not mourn. He did not march backwards."

False. After some in congress and his administration tried to kill off the colonization offfice, Lincoln went to bat for Mitchell, its commissioner, to keep him on the job and in pursuit of colonization. That was November 1864 and the proof is irrefutable.

In 1864, John Hay recorded in his diary that Lincoln had "sloughed off" all these notions of colonization.

Must've changed his mind again then! Bates' letter shows Lincoln was pushing colonization in November of that same year.

Lincoln abandoned colonization schemes after 1862.

Prove it then by quoting Lincoln repudiating colonization.

278 posted on 08/16/2003 7:05:25 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson