Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bedolido; stainlessbanner; 4ConservativeJustices; aomagrat; GOPcapitalist; stand watie
bump
112 posted on 08/13/2003 11:23:18 AM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: billbears
Allegedly, Licoln issued the EP as a "war" measure, to deprive the Confederacy of workers, to promote an insurrection and possible slaughter in the South, and maybe thought that the South would believe he legally had the power to do so, and return to the fold.

One major problem. He had no legal authority to do so. The Confederacy had seceded, just as the colonies had seceded from Britain in 1776, and as had 9 of the several states from the Articles of Confederation & Perpetual Union. Even if Lincoln did have some legality to issue the EP as a "war" measure, the Supreme Court had previously ruled that the owners of seized property must be renumerated. Lastly, even the Constitution prevents the taking of property by the federal government, and Lincoln wrote a letter to his law-partner Herndon that his actions were unconstitutional.

154 posted on 08/13/2003 2:06:59 PM PDT by 4CJ (Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson