Ah yes, you must be referring to cu-MULE-ative evidence! (Pronunciation footnote: Chris Darden from OJ trial.)LOL. Yes, that's the one. Much of the time the dispute centers on the un-DUL-y preju-DIC-ial part, too.
The beauty of it is that he did so much talking on videotape. That way they'll get to see his demeanor, as well as hear his words.
You're right, the video portion could be particularly persuasive here. LOL. ;-)
I would dearly love to see Scott's lawyers get up there and argue that showing videotapes of their own client sitting there with Diane Sawyer, "explaining everything", would be unduly prejudicial! That would mark heights of absurdity hitherto unknown even to Geragos and Dalton.